User talk:DorianAlexander

September 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Leslie Feinberg, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. ''Wikipedia has a policy on the use of alternative personal pronouns in articles. You should read it before doing a blanket change on an article.'' 10mmsocket (talk) 13:56, 2 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Apologies I didn't add the link MOS:IDENTITY plus the see-also page that backs it up. 10mmsocket (talk) 13:57, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Leslie Feinberg. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Ifnord (talk) 14:03, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Pronouns
The subject is quoted as saying "she" accepted "she" as a pronoun. Articles are written for the benefit of the reader, not to advocate for something - like gender neutral pronouns. Ifnord (talk) 14:02, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Leslie Feinberg. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 14:03, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Leslie Feinberg, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 14:03, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Leslie Feinberg. Serols (talk) 14:03, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 14:32, 2 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Jake - I'm as quick to take disruptive editors to WP:AIV as anyone, but this editor made three sets of edits in a short time, likely in good faith, and has since stopped. I believe it likely that the editor has now see the large number of talk page messages and has ceased edit warring. I personally think a ban at this point is premature. 10mmsocket (talk) 14:35, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I somehow misread the timestamps. I will remove the block.  Jake Wartenberg (talk) 14:55, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I will of course monitor, educate and if necessary report any further issues. 10mmsocket (talk) 15:03, 2 September 2021 (UTC)