User talk:Dorian Gray Wild/Archive 1

__NOINDEX__

Ways to improve Alex Fridman
Hi, I'm Cwmhiraeth. Dorian Gray Wild, thanks for creating Alex Fridman!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The Social Activity section is too detailed in my opinion. It would be better if it were reduced in length by summarising a lot of the information.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:33, 21 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your words, and I forwarded your message. I have just translated the article from Hebrew to English. Same issue exists here. In Hebrew it was fine, and in English it was subjective. Dgw (talk) 07:57, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Discussion at WP:MCQ
You are invited to join the discussion at. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:18, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Not Half A Human 2018.webm listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Not Half A Human 2018.webm, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:32, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I have moved the former discussion to File_talk:Not_Half_A_Human_2018.webm, as it is the proper place to be kept without archiving, and would modify accordingly the internal link in my response. Dgw (talk) 00:23, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If the file is deleted, its talk page will be deleted as well per WP:G8; so, it would've been better to have left the discussion at WP:MCQ. The thread might get archived, but it will never be deleted from MCQ. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:41, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Stav Shafir
Hello, re Stav Shafir, I would suggest that the first course of action is to place the quote in a more appropriate place in the article body, rather than the lead. May be make it a little less POV and fit in with surrounding text to avoid the undue complaint. If you are reverted from this then you could try WP:RFC but have no idea what the outcome would be, depends on the users who respond. I would avoid WP:DRN until you have tried the new location for the quote as they may accept that. Keith D (talk) 20:38, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

The IP was socking
Per  Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 11:21, 26 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Thus they are blocked. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 11:22, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Lapidomator for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lapidomator is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lapidomator until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 09:04, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Moshe Shem Tov


Hello, Dorian Gray Wild. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Moshe Shem Tov".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 08:25, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data/Automatically updated cases
Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data/Automatically updated cases has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Moxy 🍁 06:05, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Module:CoronaTable
Module:CoronaTable has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the module's entry on the Templates for discussion page. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:37, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

October 2020


A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006.  Fight for freedom, stand with Hong Kong! (talk) 20:02, 6 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The page in question was not a traditional attack page. However, the claims about the subject amounted to a gross violation of BLP, and the nature of the claims meant the only reasonable path forward was to delete the article. —C.Fred (talk) 20:58, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello, I read Britney Spears and Madonna, and found there worse things. I did my best to describe the article in an equal manner, and wrote: "Prompt and steady achievements", which was erased. I used its own words: "I'm independent and don’t rely on anybody but myself, which has taught me how to have healthy relationships with people instead of being codependent. My mental health is so strong right now I’m so fucking proud of myself, you have no idea..." On the other hand, there was no possibility to remove facts which did happen as well as real names of people, which were widely shown in all kinds of the social media and was registered as a public company in California, with a permit to issue 10,000 shares.
 * I also do not find my edits, which are not shown in my total edits count.
 * I am puzzled of the G6 criterion. Those who require WP:SD, should choose the right criterion.
 * In a nutshel, am I allowed to save the article in my user space, with ? Dgw (talk) 01:12, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * The difference is that those article bases any claims, including the subjects' identities, on independent reliable sources. Social media, particularly unverified accounts, is not reliable, and primary sources like court reports should never be used as sources.
 * Thus, the problems with your article were with the subject's real name (as opposed to stage name), family members, and other details that tie to the alleged real name. BLP violations like that are not allowed anywhere on Wikipedia, including user space. —C.Fred (talk) 02:22, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello, I address you due to the phrases which were written in Articles for deletion/Gabbie Carter. I have already written: "The issue is Carter, not me. Phrases like "You left out this part about AVN", "are you serious?", "You have ceased to make any sense at all" may not be accepted in Wikipedia", but the reply was: "Pointing out faults in low quality evidence, evidence-free arguments and way-off-topic tangents does not constitute a personal attack [...] Citing flagged propaganda to justify the use of porn industry propaganda, flies in the face of Wikipedia standards to the point of absurdity [...] You are straying so far off topic for dialog to be productive. Again, please produce evidence that is relevant. Otherwise, you are wasting time". You may not say that I did not warn him. I did. Therefore I ask you to warn this user. Please notice that he did not put any when the article was extended, but did it only in the revised article. By my participation in "Articles for deletion/Carter" you may see clearly that I did not have any issue with Carter.
 * Being exact, nobody demanded the user to reply me. I wrote it in a deletion discussion, not on his user talk page. Additionally, I may discuss Carter as I see her. She got only praises, awards and high profits. It made her notable, and I wrote it. There was no reason to complain my words. A mild solution was to avoid replying. Regards, Dgw (talk) 15:43, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * The comment about "You have ceased to make any sense at all" is borderline, but in the context of the discussion, it relates to the comments you had made in the thread and not you as an editor, so I'm giving the other party the benefit of the doubt. —C.Fred (talk) 15:52, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Yesterday and today I read Carter's words in Reddit. Due to BLP, I would not repeat it, but I know everything about her. However, I did not change my mind. Carter is notable. Dgw (talk) 17:29, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Dorian Gray Wild

Thank you for creating Gabbie Carter.

User:Gene93k, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

• Gene93k (talk) 13:43, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Gabbie Carter for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gabbie Carter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gabbie Carter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006.  Fight for freedom, stand with Hong Kong! (talk) 03:38, 8 October 2020 (UTC)