User talk:Dornbiker

RED
Sorry to remove the review you added to the article on the film RED but please see WP:EL where it explains it is not usual to add more than a few links to the External links section. Reviews - if of good quality or relevance -- are usually better added to the Reception or Critical response section in the form of a Reference and preferably formatted as a citatation cite web. Hope that helps. -- Horkana (talk) 01:52, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

November 2010
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Note that blogs are not usually considered valid additions as links or review sources, and Wikipedia prohibits use of the site for promotional purposes. Ckatz chat spy  04:41, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:UCDavisEngineeringMark081117.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:UCDavisEngineeringMark081117.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:05, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:CoE Logos Low Resolution.png
Thanks for uploading File:CoE Logos Low Resolution.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:06, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CoE Logos Low Resolution.png
 Thanks for uploading File:CoE Logos Low Resolution.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:54, 12 April 2011 (UTC)