User talk:Doro100

Welcome!

 * }

November 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Dorota Malek has been reverted. Your edit here to Dorota Malek was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.featured-artists.blogspot.com) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:19, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dorota Malek


The article Dorota Malek has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable musical artist lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. red dog six (talk) 23:12, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Dorota Malek do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Your edit here to Dorota Malek was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=240548632632880) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 06:56, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Dorota Malek, without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing Wikipedia. MikeWazowski (talk) 14:13, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Dorota Malek. Calabe1992 14:21, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently removing maintenance templates from an article without addressing the relevant issues, despite warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:55, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

What do i have to change to make that article relevant???

Nomination of Dorota Malek for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dorota Malek is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dorota Malek until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. red dog six (talk) 16:09, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

WHAT SHOULD I CHANGE?
 * The notability guidelines linked above show what is necessary if the article is to be kept. JohnCD (talk) 17:28, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Can u help me what to change? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.47.185.250 (talk) 17:33, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Are the changes on that article ok now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Halina000 (talk • contribs) 18:28, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

please dont delete my changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dorota000 (talk • contribs) 18:59, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Blocked
need help with that article/dorota — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.47.180.240 (talk) 16:53, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

ONE MORE TIME.. THAT PICTURES IS MY OWN WORK! LIKE ALL THE OTHERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 * Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted images. Please see WP:COPYVIO.  red dog six  (talk) 16:45, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:18, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Dorota Malek, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''Please stop adding copyrighted material to Wikipedia. If you continue you will be banned from editing or creating articles. red dog six''  (talk) 23:30, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Dorota Malek for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dorota Malek is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dorota Malek (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:07, 17 October 2013 (UTC)