User talk:Dorotinsky sky

August 2013
You have re-created a deleted article. The version you created was virtually identical to several previously deleted versions, so that it was clearly not an independent creation, and it is evident that you are either the same person who previously created the article or else someone working closely together with one or more others who have done so. In either case, it is inconceivable that you re-created the article without knowing that it had previously been deleted several times, and highly improbable that you were unaware of at least some of the reasons given for deletion, but you chose to ignore them. Furthermore, you changed the title of the article, apparently because the original title had been protected to prevent repeated re-creation. Attempting to get round administrative actions in that sort of way is unhelpful.

The article contained large quantities of text copied verbatim or almost verbatim from other web sites, clearly infringing copyright. Copyright infringement is not tolerated in Wikipedia. In addition, the article was not written from a neutral point of view, but was clearly intended as promotion. Either of these would have been sufficient grounds for deletion.

Editors who edit disruptively can be blocked from editing if they persist in their disruptive editing after having been warned. You, or your colleagues with whom you are collaborating, have now received far more than enough warnings, and any further disruptive editing by any account that appears to be the same person, or one of the same group of people, may led to an immediate block without further notice. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:21, 26 August 2013 (UTC)