User talk:Dortega94

Welcome and introduction
Hi, Dortega94. This is NOT some automated message...it's from a real person by golly! And this real person (that would be me), wants to say welcome to Wikipedia! I'm glad you've made an account! Thanks for joining; you're on your way to making some great contributions.

Because I've noticed you've just joined, I wanted to give you a few tips to get you started. If you have any questions, please talk to us. Any questions are fine, nothing is too silly (we've heard them all). Now, the tips below - hop on them - they should help you begin editing. Best of luck! JoeSmack Talk 20:18, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

P.S. If you just feel like poking around, Help is a good place to start. :)

The page Alonso de Mendoza
Can you tell me where this text came from? It is rather disjointed and strangely formatted. Rich Farmbrough, 01:23, 4 November 2009 (UTC).

Bolivia
Until you have a reference you can provide, please stop changing Bolivia from Plurinational to Republic. According to the constitution, it is the Plurinational state of Bolivia. Thanks,  Ono pearls  (t/c) 19:57, 24 December 2009 (UTC)


 * I could care less if it "pisses you off", according to the IMF and the United Nations, that is the official name of Bolivia. And Wikipedia can't be used as a source for other Wikipedia articles. Please provided a reliable source, not discussions from the Spanish Wikipedia. If you can't, then please refrain from changing it. If you believe this is incorrect, please start a discussion here. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia.  Ono pearls  (t/c) 17:26, 27 December 2009 (UTC)


 * What the people of the country call it does not affect it's official name. People living in the Russian Federation call their country Russia, people in the United States of America call it the US, USA, or America. I've started a discussion here, please feel free to express your opinions there. Thank you,  Ono pearls  (t/c) 20:00, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Dortega94! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:57, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Juan Del Granado -

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:La Paz Skyline By Dortega94.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:La Paz Skyline By Dortega94.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 02:13, 1 May 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  • ɔ   ʃ   →  02:13, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File:La Paz Skyline By Dortega.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:La Paz Skyline By Dortega.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. —Bkell (talk) 17:39, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Also File:La Paz Skyline By Dortega94.jpg. —Bkell (talk) 17:45, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:La Paz Skyline By Dortega94.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:La Paz Skyline By Dortega94.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 17:03, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Falsely licensed images
Using other people's work without permission or attribution is unacceptable. Copyright infringement and plagiarism pose serious moral, legal, and reputation problems. Remember: Users who upload content (La Paz city images) with false license declarations ... may be blocked. feydey (talk) 00:25, 26 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Dortega, I'm not sure you've understood the issue here, so I'll try to explain once again: the problem with your La Paz collage is that it consists of several source images, and you need to document who created each of them, because the copyright remains that of their respective authors. If all of the component images are in fact freely licensed (preferably if they are all uploaded separately on Commons), then you can make a collage of them, but you shouldn't claim it as your own copyright. Instead, you should list all sources and authors on the image description page. Take a look at other city collages, e.g. File:Athens Montage 2.jpg, to see how it can be done. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:53, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Fundacion de La Paz.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fundacion de La Paz.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:46, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for ignoring image upload warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. feydey (talk) 08:19, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Copyright violations
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. This includes text directly translated from other web sites or printed materials.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

Block
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you now understand the copyright policy, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:56, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * This block is not meant to be an infinite block, but since you have not edited in several years, I wanted to make sure you understand this very important policy before resuming your editing. Once you have read and understood the policy, you are welcome to appeal your block.  Regards, Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:56, 20 May 2015 (UTC)