User talk:Dorthejysk

I have two questions.

I am updating a page with the name Jysk (store). First, I want to change the title, because the correct title of the firm is just "JYSK". Second, at the top of the page, this message is shown "This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (August 2012)" But I already marked content with references and I deleted the old version, which was not correct.

So how can I change the title and make the note about verification go away?

And thank you for helping. I do understand the rules. I am just a little confused on how the Wikipedia works. I know in fact that some of the facts in the introduction text is incorrect, so I don't understand why I can't change them. I now understand that I can delete big parts of other peoples work, but when it is wrong I don't understand why I can't change it. Also you deleted my changes in the timeline and I just updated to make it more trustworthy and more correct. But I will take an extra look at the rules.


 * Please sign your comments on talk pages with four tildes like this: ~, so that people know that it is you who posted the comment.
 * I reverted your changes to the article because a lot of them were invalid for the reasons I identified. Not all of your changes were invalid, so you can go ahead and put changes that conform to Wikipedia policy and style back in -- please be sure to add the references to reliable sources when you do. Ground Zero | t 17:52, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

An administrator responds
There was a discussion about this on the article talk page that explains why the article is entitled "Jysk", not "JYSK". See WP:TRADEMARK.

I have reverted your edits to the article because you have copied text from the company's website. This is a copyright violation. See WP:COPYVIO.

More importantly, please understand that Wikipedia dos not exist to provide space for a copy of a corporate website, or to provide promotional space for a company. This is an encyclopedia. I will provide below a list of links that I encourage you to review to understand how Wikipedia works, and how to contribute constructively.

Also, please do not remove citations to reliable sources. We are looking for third-party external sources to build this encyclopedia. The company's website is not a reliable source. Please see WP:RS. Thank you. Ground Zero | t 09:02, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

I am a little confused. You asked for help, and I took the time to explain some Wikipedia policies to help you understand how to contribute to Wikipedia, and then you completely ignored my advice. It is important for you to understand that you cannot get your own way in Wikipedia by making the same edits repeatedly, especially when they violate Wikipedia policies. That sort of behavior will lead to you being blocked from editing. Please take some time to review some Wikipedia policies. Below is the list that I promised above. Ground Zero | t 12:12, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Dorthejysk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Ground Zero | t 12:12, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

September 2014
Hello, Dorthejysk. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:22, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Promotional editing
Did you read my message above about conflict of interest? Did you follow up any of the links? Wikipedia is not a medium for advertising, promotion, or expressing opinions. Such language as, for example "the country's leading merchant who always has 'a great offer' for everyone" cannot by any stretch of the imagination be regarded as neutral, and to suggest that you were merely making the article "more trustworthy and more correct" shows either disingenuity or else a remarkable lack of ability to see the nature of your own writing. If you continue to try to use Wikipedia for promotional purposes, you may be blocked from editing. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:16, 18 September 2014 (UTC)