User talk:Dosimmon

Image:PollDon.JPG listed for deletion
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:PollDon.JPG has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license GFDL-self-no-disclaimers to license it under the GFDL, or cc-by-sa-2.5 to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use PD-self to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Media copyright questions. Thank you.

File:Simmons speaks.JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Simmons speaks.JPG, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Skier Dude ( talk ) 00:10, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

your bio
Please read WP:COI and also our Business FAQ (which also applies to non-profit organisations and individuals. You cannot copy material from university web sites unless you can obtain a copyright release. I rewrote that, and shortened things a little. Your opinion of your own intelligence is not encyclopedic content. I clarified some things--as far as I can tell, your academic rank is Associate professor. In my experience in reviewing hundreds of academic articles for Wikipedia, when an academic omits his exact rank on a bio, it is usually not full professor. The article had been nominated for rapid deletion as not adequately showing notability, partly on account of the promotional language used. As reviewing administrator, I thought the career probably notable, with emphasis on the deanship and the directorship of the center. But the article can still be challenged for regular deletion. You really should try to find some 3rd party independent reliable published sources, print or online (but not blogs or press releases, or material based on press releases). Independent in this context means from outside the university. In particular, each award needs an exact reference. By the way, of just what town are you a member of the city council? And in the last convention as an alternate, which candidate were you pledged for? I'll be keeping track to see if it gets nominated for deletion, and you should also. Things can move very fast here. DGG (talk) 16:38, 31 January 2009 (UTC)