User talk:Dotyacd

Welcome!
Hello, Dotyacd, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RJFJR (talk) 17:08, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

edit warring on Michel Chossudovsky
Your recent editing history at Michel Chossudovsky shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Also, as already explained to you, the text you're adding is not encyclopedic. We don't just go into an article and insert our own personal feelings about its content up on top.  Volunteer Marek  00:00, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

WP:NPOV
Given edits such as this one, I question your neutrality: you're not just giving editorial commentary and praising the subject, but you're also inserting spam links to Amazon. Each of these individually could be reason to deny you the ability to edit Wikipedia. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 18:05, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

My point is to alert readers to the defamatory bias of the article.
 * You can't make that point in article space--and how your making that point is helped by a link to Amazon, well. Drmies (talk) 03:19, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

The Amazon link lists his publications. It is a legitimate source for them.
 * No it is not. You don't understand the rules here for sourcing, and if you can't tell the difference between sourcing and promoting, maybe you need a block per WP:CIR. Drmies (talk) 02:57, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Michel Chossudovsky‎ for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. — Paleo Neonate  – 02:55, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:47, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Callannecc and PaleoNeonate - Please come right out and tell me specifically what is bothering you about what I am doing and why you have authority to communicate with me in this manner.

I assert that the administrators (you, e.g.?) are acting as involved parties (i.e., not impartial and for which I have requested arbitration) and that the result in the case of the Michel Chossudovsky page does not achieve Wikipedia's stated purpose and violates each of the following five pillars:

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dotyacd (talk • contribs) 12:09, 28 November 2017 (UTC)


 * I am not an administrator. My above message was about WP:TPG.  The other message sent by Callannecc is one which can be sent to anyone editing in relation to a topic where arbitration committee established arbitrary sanctions exist (that banner is not a threat and includes the text ).  — Paleo  Neonate  – 15:00, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

So you two are just users who disagree with my point of view? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dotyacd (talk • contribs) 16:34, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

ANI thread notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. This is also an opportunity to discuss the issue with administrators. — Paleo Neonate  – 22:54, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for ignoring all warnings and persisting in disrupting Talk:Michel Chossudovsky. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bishonen &#124; talk 23:42, 28 November 2017 (UTC)


 * , this editor has returned and is now doing the same vandalism that he was temporarily blocked for initially. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 22:33, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yeap. --Yamla (talk) 22:36, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.