User talk:Double sharp/Periodic table

Comments requested
Following on from last year: I made a first redraft.

I think it is already better than what we have at Periodic table. However, we are here to try to replace an FA that was found unsatisfactory, so it needs to be not just better than that, but worthy of the best. Hence I ask for comments to get there. Double sharp (talk) 14:04, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * And also, sorry. Double sharp (talk) 14:09, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay. I think nonmetallic character doesn't mean pulling electrons from other atoms, but keeping their own electrons. Just look at noble gases. Droog Andrey (talk) 14:23, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, my bad. Changed it. :) Double sharp (talk) 15:29, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Ref. 46 is missing. And there are rather much brackets in the text :) Droog Andrey (talk) 15:36, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Made a start at eliminating them. :) Double sharp (talk) 15:55, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
 * "Presentation forms" subchapter should be expanded a bit (e.g. with old-style group numbering IA, IIA, ...). Droog Andrey (talk) 15:42, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Took some text from current version of Periodic table to cover this. Double sharp (talk) 15:55, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

For older history section
See User:Double sharp/Periodic table/Old history section. Double sharp (talk) 12:22, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

And older periodic trends section
See User:Double sharp/Periodic table/Old periodic trends section. Double sharp (talk) 13:20, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

For core electrons
Reminder to reference Wulfsberg's Foundations of Inorganic Chemistry (the first text I've seen that actually says it explicitly). Double sharp (talk) 14:36, 13 April 2021 (UTC)