User talk:Doublea25

3RR
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing at Anthony Carelli. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. -- Scorpion0422 17:01, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Stop hand.svg|30px|left|Warning]]

Biographies of Living Persons
I noticed you deleted my message earlier about not adding information until it is published by a reliable source. I specifically mentioned that, for something like an arrest, a wrestling "news" site is not sufficient. If the statement is true, as it turned out to be, reliable sources will mention it. Until then, it should not be included in the article. If you have any questions about why this is the case, I urge you to read Biographies of living persons and Reliable sources. I notice that you add links to The Wrestling Herald fairly often, and I think it's important that you realize that most wrestling "news" sites are not considered reliable sources for information about the wrestlers' personal lives. Adding information about a living person without a reliable source can get Wikipedia in a lot of legal trouble. Thank you, GaryColemanFan (talk) 23:07, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Nomination of Let it fly energy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Let it fly energy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Let it fly energy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. AutomaticStrikeout 01:35, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Let It Fly Energy


A tag has been placed on Let It Fly Energy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Triplestop (talk) 07:18, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Moved to userspace
I moved the article to User:Doublea25/Let It Fly Energy so you can continue to work on it. The biggest problem here is that I can't see where notability is established outside of Miller creating it. Many of the sources you listed in the article are trivial at best when it comes to the drink. The list of locations where you can buy the drink is primary and since the most basic purpose of that specific link is to tell people where to buy it, it's a borderline merchant link. Links of that sort are considered to be generally inappropriate to link to on Wikipedia in general. I've removed the link and the mentions of where to buy the drink line, as that can be seen as promotional in tone.

Now when it comes to the drink getting used by various people in sports, be aware that notability is not inherited by anyone using it. Notability is shown by the drink getting in-depth coverage such as articles about the drink in specific. Photos of people drinking the beverage are not enough to show notability. That pretty much leaves only one source for the drink, the Forbes link. That's not enough to show notability at this point in time. In any case, there is no true harm in letting you continue to work on the article in your userspace at this point in time. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:20, 20 September 2013 (UTC)