User talk:Doubleglazingzone

Speedy deletion nomination of Double glazing zone


A tag has been placed on Double glazing zone, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dps04 (talk) 04:59, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Your username
Hi there, I am Dps04. Your username, Doubleglazingzone, seems to be unambiguously representing the name of a company, an institution or otherwise a group and thus violated Wikipedia's username policy with regards to the use of promotional usernames. Additionally, you seem to have been involved in inappropriately promotional behaviors, as you did in Double glazing zone. For more about Wikipedia's policy on usernames, you may want to have a look at Wikipedia's username policy. If you think I have made a mistake, please message me on my talk page. Thanks. --Dps04 (talk) 05:11, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  05:58, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

RE:Your username
Hi there,

Thank you for your email. Unfortunately, I have just noticed that you have been blocked indefinitely for using a promotional username and engaging in promotion editing on Wikipedia. If you are reading this page now, you may wish to appeal your block by following the instructions above, preferrably after reading the guide to appealing blocks. Thanks for your attention and I look forward to your contributions (if you are unblocked). --Dps04 (talk) 06:09, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
 * An additional note: next time if you want to message me, you can simply do so at my talk page instead of emailing me, unless for some reason you prefer to keep the contents of our conversation confidential. Thanks again. --Dps04 (talk) 06:28, 2 June 2016 (UTC)