User talk:Doublespeak84


 * You haven't been blocked?  Then why are you running a second account?  Could you clarify what the name of your main account is?  -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:53, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Doublespeak84 and again, what was the justification for even running an ip check? Doublespeak84 (talk) 13:56, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Why is there an assumption that I am running a second account? Doublespeak84 (talk) 13:58, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
 * No, I mean your other username. In your comments, you confidently jumped into the middle of a discussion at WP:ANI, which isn't a place that new users would be likely to stumble upon, and you spoke with the voice of someone who has already had the experience to develop strong opinions about administrators, so you clearly have been editing here for some time. Of course, you also didn't understand what an administrator's jobs and responsibilities are, so you can't have been been here for all that long, either. I wouldn't feel right about blocking this account when you obviously have another one, but since I don't have the capability of running ip checks, I don't know which account it is. This account seems to only exist to make ill-informed and rather general attacks, so you should probably just go back to editing under that other name; I don't mind if you choose not to tell me what it is, since I don't really care that much. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:00, 2 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Wow, you know, it's pretty awful to be acting as if assumptions are fact, and even worse to shun someone from a community based upon some kind of obscure assumption that they know a lot about the community so MUST have been a part of it at some time. Do you also believe that someone who knows a bit about concentration camps must have been a resident of one? Have you ever heard of Kafka? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Trial

And to say you don't really care much is the epitome of authoritarian abusive mentality. Doublespeak84 (talk) 14:31, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

{unblock|I REALLY think a senior administrator (if there is such a thing) should have a look at this}}
 * There is no reason to place a second unblock request when the first one is still open. All administrators are equal.  -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:36, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
 * To say that I don't care isn't authoritarian, it's pragmatic. On this account, you have done nothing but make attacks, and those attacks have absolutely no basis in Wikipedia's rules or practices.  There is no evidence that suggests that you are interested in helping write an encyclopedia, or even in learning Wikipedia's rules; the evidence suggests that you are only interested in being insulting.  Practically speaking, then, it doesn't matter who you are, or what your reasons are.  Many people get their entertainment from starting fights, but wikipedia is not interested in entertaining you in that way.  The protection of this talk page from further edits is imminent.  The only possibility of an unblock would have been you making a persuasive case that you really were a new and ignorant user, and that you genuinely wanted to learn the rules and contribute to the encyclopedia, but you've already made that extremely unlikely. The next step, of course, will be the full protection of this talk page, so that you can move on to picking fights elsewhere. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:45, 2 September 2008 (UTC)