User talk:Doubleupsafe

I appreciate you adding a reference to your statement on the Wikipedia page. I invite you to review the evidence that was released to the public on March 30th, 2016. You can find links to this evidence at the following web page: http://www.hennepinattorney.org/news/news/2016/March/jamar-clark-decision

There's quite a bit and you're welcome to review all of it. If you're interested in a summary, the first PDF linked is very good.

Upon reviewing the evidence you will see DNA evidence demonstrate that Jamar Clark had ahold of officer Ringgenberg's weapon. Once this evidence was released, most media outlets removed the "unarmed" claim when it came to Jamar Clark.

Given the evidence, it is inappropriate for the Wikipedia page to state that Jamar Clark was unarmed.

Thank you.