User talk:Dougal83

March 2017
Hello, I'm Drchriswilliams. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Civic nationalism, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Drchriswilliams (talk) 18:36, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Civic nationalism, without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Drchriswilliams (talk) 19:01, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Civic nationalism. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Drchriswilliams (talk) 19:19, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

You should really start discussing things as opposed to just reverting. Join us on the talk page.VR talk  15:36, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Civic nationalism. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Drchriswilliams (talk) 18:36, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You have made a series of edits to Civic nationalism where you have stated that you are removing vandalism, but this is clearly not the case. If you feel that there is material that is missing from the article then you should discuss this on the talk page of the article. Drchriswilliams (talk) 16:14, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Drchriswilliams is undergoing a campaign to remove sourced material from wikipedia. Be wary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dougal83 (talk • contribs) 16:29, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Drchriswilliams (talk) 17:17, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

I noticed. I am extremely happy that your behaviour will come under review. I regret the time that will be wasted by impartial reviewers. Thanks guys. Please strip the offending account of editing rights, whoever is in the wrong. Dougal83 (talk) 17:25, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * From the report: blocked 36 hours for disruptive editing. Please read WP:NOTVAND during this time. --Neil N  talk to me 17:42, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Neil N  talk to me 17:36, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
When you're unblocked you can raise a sockpuppet accusation if you have evidence of sockpuppetry. PhilKnight (talk) 23:06, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Reviewing the sockpuppetry case, the contribution history for each editor (Master/Sock), and the revision history for the page in question, it is beyond clear that you are abusing multiple accounts. You can deny it up and down all you like, no one on Wikipedia is inclined to take your word for it. If you were truly innocent, the evidence would show as much. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 21:59, 12 April 2017 (UTC)