User talk:Dough4872/Archive 2011

Seaford, Delaware
Thank you for adding that copypaste tag to the article. I have removed the copyrighted content and the template appropriately. Parts of the material in the history section was copied from two sources: http://www.e50plus.com/public/1268print.cfm and http://www.seafordde.com/index.cfm?ref=21100. I have also made a notice on the article's talk page about prohibiting the restoration of copyrighted material. Anyway, thanks very much! Minima c  (talk ) 10:31, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Winter 2010 USRD newsletter


JCbot (talk) 01:02, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia Ambassador Program is looking for new Online Ambassadors
Hi! I noticed your activity as a Good Article reviewer, and wanted to let you know about the Wikipedia Ambassador Program, and specifically the role of Online Ambassador. We're looking for friendly Wikipedians who are good at reviewing articles and giving feedback to serve as mentors for students who are assigned to write for Wikipedia in their classes.

If you're interested, I encourage you to take a look at the Online Ambassador guidelines; the "mentorship process" describes roughly what will be expected of mentors in the coming term. If that's something you want to do, please apply!

You can find instructions for applying at WP:ONLINE. The main things we're looking for in Online Ambassadors are friendliness, regular activity (since mentorship is a commitment that spans several months), and the ability to give detailed, substantive feedback on articles (both short new articles, and longer, more mature ones).

I hope to hear from you soon.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 20:28, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrolled
Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:
 * This permission does not give you any special status or authority
 * Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
 * You may wish to display the Autopatrolled top icon and/or the User wikipedia/autopatrolled userbox on your user page
 * If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
 * If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Courcelles 10:47, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Oakdale Merge
I emphatically disagree about the Oakdale Merge being non-notable. I could try to convince you with this link, or I could point out that it's about as non-notable as the Bruckner Interchange, and the only difference between the two is that Bruckner actually has road bridges. DanTD (talk) 01:15, 2 February 2011 (UTC)


 * It is a couple ramps off of NY 27 to the parallel Montauk Highway, and as such it's known for being an obstruction at best, and a hazard at worst, which is what makes it deserving of an article. It was built in this manner as a substitute for a real interchange, whereas if it were just that it wouldn't be worthy of one. As far as me showing you an SPS, SFW? That SPS still has the the info and history behind it, and even if the website didn't exist, the interchange would still be notable for the reasons mentioned above. DanTD (talk) 01:36, 2 February 2011 (UTC)


 * It might be worth considering. If so, I think it should be a separate chapter in the New York State Route 27 article. You claimed that it doesn't look any more special than any other interchange on a suburban highway, but I don't know of too many like this, especially those that are named... and dreaded. DanTD (talk)


 * I don't think the chapter needs to be split as much as it needs to be trimmed. I'd do it now, but my PC is hindering my ability to cut and paste again, so I'll have to wait until another time. DanTD (talk) 02:16, 2 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Are you sure NY 22 or NY 28 are the perfect examples for an article on NY 27? I still think the descriptions of the former interchange configurations, and formerly proposed interchanges should be left in, and I don't know of any part of Routes 22 or 28 that have anything similar. While you're at it, since you merged the Prospect Expressway article into NY 27, maybe that should be a whole separate sub-chapter within the New York City route description. DanTD (talk) 02:31, 2 February 2011 (UTC)


 * If people want to know why things along Route 27 are the way they are, they're going to have to know about the former and proposed interchanges. DanTD (talk) 02:49, 2 February 2011 (UTC)


 * That's a great idea; they should be mentioned. My only concern is that separate articles about former or proposed interchanges on any state highway won't be able stand up to WP:GNG. –Fredddie™ 03:01, 2 February 2011 (UTC)


 * I suppose that means you'd merge every interchange mentioned in Category:Road interchanges in the United States, and I right? Feel free to correct me if this isn't the case. In the meantime, I see that User:Floydian trimmed the chapter a lot. Not bad, although he did miss the opportunity for one citation, which I found and added. That and he eliminated the proposed flyover. DanTD (talk) 12:36, 2 February 2011 (UTC)


 * I would say it's more of the reason why there are zero articles about interchanges in Iowa than anything else. I, myself, will not be merging any of the interchanges in the category any time soon, but there are a couple in there of which I question their notability.  The best option would be for the project to come up with a scope for interchanges and then work from there. –Fredddie™ 23:24, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

There's still one question you didn't answer though, Doug; How is the Oakdale Merge like "any other interchange on a suburban highway?" Because I've both seen and been on enough of them to know otherwise. DanTD (talk) 15:19, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep in mind, I'm not arguing for restoration of it as a separate article. DanTD (talk) 15:23, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, and for the record, while I'm satisfied with redirecting this to Sunrise Highway, I have to ask; does the interchange you showed me have a unique name? DanTD (talk) 15:38, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

PA 363
Hey, I reviewed your GAN and put it on hold. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 17:21, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Opinion
Would you mind going to Articles for deletion/Abbotts Mill, Delaware and commenting with your opinion on the deletion I proposed? As a frequent contributor to Sussex County, Delaware and articles relating to communities in Sussex County, I thought you may have knowledge whether Abbotts Mill, Delaware is a community or not. Thanks. Superman7515 (talk) 19:29, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

U.S. Route 19E
Please revert your changes related to U.S. Route 19E. U.S. Route 19 splits into 19E and 19W through two states and then rejoins. However, 19E is the main throughway. The exit to 19W is barely noticeable. Therefore, the complete end to end journey on U.S. Route 19 requires travel on 19E. If you remove 19E, 19 would then need to be split into north and south parts, which would totally confuse people. All the maps and distances in all the articles have been setup with the 19/19E usage. Any change would be a massive undertaking and result in reader confusion. —UncleDouggie (talk) 06:41, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Do you have a source that US 19E is considered the mainline of US 19? From what I know, suffixed routes are equal splits in a U.S. Highway. For other suffxied routes, such as U.S. Route 31W and U.S. Route 31E, we have two articles describing each branch. We can have separate articles describing U.S. Route 19W and U.S. Route 19E full length in both states while the U.S. Route 19 in North Carolina and U.S. Route 19 in Tennessee articles can detail the portion of route in each state that is part of the unified US 19. If you would like another opinion on this issue, I would suggest leaving a comment at WT:USRD. Dough 48 72  19:05, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

GA Delaware Route 71
I have placed your review on hold. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 16:36, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

GA Pennsylvania Route 132
I have placed your review on hold. Thanks. Racepacket (talk) 13:26, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

GA Delaware Route 82
I have placed your review on hold. Thanks. Racepacket (talk) 16:16, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Alabama State Route 73
I've reviewed your nomination of Alabama State Route 73, but I have some questions, which can be found on the review page.

RfC/U-related
Racepacket has yet to comment on my proposed solution because neither you nor Rschen have indicated an opinion of it. He's said that he's running the "risk that the other two will jump back in and ask for more". Can you comment on the RfC/U talk page to indicate your opinion of the specific proposal so that maybe he'll finally indicate his opinion of it?  Imzadi 1979  →   18:02, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * You might want to look over the section I just added to the talk page. I made two minor changes to the wording of my proposal because LauraHale's comments expressed a desire to expand from Netball to Netball and women's sports. I also clarified my original intent, that WP:IAR and common sense are both tools to apply to exceptions to any kind of rules. RP has been asked as bluntly and politely as I can to reply to the proposal. I'm afraid he might take the two modifications as a reason to stall further.  Imzadi 1979  →   14:21, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Arbitration
You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Arbitration/Requests and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
 * Arbitration/Requests;
 * Arbitration guide.

Thanks, Rschen7754 04:13, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Invitation to take part in a study
I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to Main Study. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates about 20 minutes. I chose you as a English Wikipedia user who made edits recently through the RecentChange page. Refer to the first page in the online survey form for more information on the study and me.cooldenny (talk) 01:52, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Hampshire Mall section deletion
Why did you remove these sections, please? - Denimadept (talk) 16:58, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Store directories are not allowed in mall articles per WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Dough 48 72  23:10, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter, Spring 2011

 * —Rschen7754bot (talk) 02:04, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Willow Grove Park Mall
The article Willow Grove Park Mall you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Willow Grove Park Mall for comments about the article. Well done! Harrison49 (talk) 14:10, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Golden Nugget changes
I saw that you changed Trump Marina to Golden Nugget Atlantic City in the Atlantic City – Brigantine Connector article. I was wondering if you had any kind of source for those changes. I know the casino has changed names, but according to this article published last week, the Trump Marina signs are going to stay on the casino for "a few more months". If the casino itself hasn't yet changed its sign, I doubt the SJTA has made new signs for the Connector. Of course, I could be wrong. – Dream out loud (talk) 02:23, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I see what you're saying, but that kinda violates both WP:CRYSTAL and WP:OR. I'm gonna revert just the exit list for now. – Dream out loud (talk) 03:49, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of U.S. Route 58 in North Carolina


A tag has been placed on U.S. Route 58 in North Carolina, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

U.S. Route 58 does not exist in North Carolina, so there is no need for the redirect, and it is not even mentioned in U.S. Route 58

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  " Pepper "   13:24, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Rollback granted
I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback correctly, and for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see New admin school/Rollback and Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Should have/should of
Hi. I saw your change here. I just wanted to let you know that "should of" is a common way of speaking the term but that "should have" is the grammatically correct construction. See. --98.26.38.144 (talk) 12:11, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

County Route 657 (Cape May County, New Jersey)
How is this not notable enough for an article? ~EDDY  (talk /contribs ) ~ 22:37, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The link you gave me was an essay. I see no reson why country routes cannot have articles if they have reliable sourcing. I'm sure I could find reliable sourcing on it. By the way, it is longer than some NJ routes. ~EDDY  (talk /contribs ) ~ 00:37, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of U.S. Route 129 in Kentucky


A tag has been placed on U.S. Route 129 in Kentucky, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

U.S. Route 129 does not exist in Kentucky, nor is Kentucky even mentioned in U.S. Route 129

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  " Pepper "   13:36, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Your revert on NJ 73 article
I saw you have reverted my edit to the New Jersey Route 73 article. The intersection at CR 616 is considered major, and the reason I say that is because during rush hour traffic frequently backs up at this intersection for over a mile on Route 73 and Church Road, even more than other intersections in that article (like CR 544). I know this since I travel on Route 73 frequently as I live off that route.

Thanks, MikeM2011 (talk) 01:36, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Talk:K-104 (Kansas highway)/GA1
I have responded to your comments. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a  message on my talk page. 01:34, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

County Routes in NJ
Hello Dough4872. I noticed some of your edits on pages about roads, especially in New Jersey and Pennsylvania. I must say first of all, fantastic work. Second, given the fact that you are a road enthusiast, by looking at your user page, and so am I, (I don't know if you looked at my edits, but I have been working on some articles pertaining to county routes and some state routes in NJ), I was wondering if you would be able to participate on pages related to county routes in Monmouth, NJ. For instance, the listing of the county routes is somewhat peculiar, in my opinion, because they are split into 3 pages, and one of them does not even exist: List of county routes in Monmouth County, New Jersey (31-57). There is this page, however, List of county routes in Monmouth County, New Jersey. At one time, each county route (except County Route 55 (Monmouth County, New Jersey) for some reason) had its own page before they became redirects to these pages: List of county routes in Monmouth County, New Jersey (1-15), and 16-30, and this red link, listing a description of each road, and even some routes have no description or table of intersections. If you notice, other lists of county routes from other NJ counties use a basic table listing, for example: List of county routes in Passaic County, New Jersey, and List of county routes in Camden County, New Jersey. What would be your thoughts? Thanks for your help. – Tinton5 (talk) 23:45, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Pre-RFC straw poll
There is a brief straw poll to see if conducting a RFC on the question of coordinates in road articles is worthwhile at WT:RJL. Your input would be appreciated. --Rschen7754 08:23, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Arizona State Route 30
Hello,

I noticed that you switched the article for AZ State Route 801 to Arizona State Route 30, as well as changed the references in several articles to reflect this change. The Arizona Department of Transportation still has the route numbered 801 on its webpages, and I am having difficulty finding any sources to indicate that the route is to be numbered 30 instead of 801.

Before simply reverting these changes I have decided to check in with you for some sourcing on why it was changed to Route 30.

Thanks,

<b style="color:#0000FF;">Sher</b><b style="color:#6060BF;">eth</b> 18:50, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the link. ADOT seems to be 'slow' in rolling out this change as it is not reflected on their website in general but it does appear in some other planning documents when you dig deep enough. I suppose that's just government efficiency for you. <b style="color:#0000FF;">Sher</b><b style="color:#6060BF;">eth</b> 19:15, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

 * — JCbot (talk) 01:16, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject The Simpsons
Welcome to the project! :) Theleftorium (talk) 11:04, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Sounds good! If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. Theleftorium (talk) 18:19, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

More Simpsons rename
Due to your recent weigh in at Mayor Quimby and/or Principal Skinner renaming, please feel free to weigh in on Dr. Hibbert and Dr. Nick renaming. Thanks, C T J F 8 3  21:48, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

New Jersey Turnpike
Hello. I have been trying to get this page to good article status. Would you be able to help contribute, as I saw you helped improve several pages on US highways and got them to be good articles. Many thanks for your efforts. Regards, Tinton5 (talk) 17:32, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:IntellDoylestown 6-18-08.JPG
 Thanks for uploading File:IntellDoylestown 6-18-08.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 19:01, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 00:48, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Pennsylvania Route 487, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page North Shore Railroad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 26 December 2011 (UTC)