User talk:Dough4872/Archive 2015

Your GA nomination of Interstate 95 in Delaware
The article Interstate 95 in Delaware you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Interstate 95 in Delaware for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PointsofNoReturn -- PointsofNoReturn (talk) 03:01, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Interstate 95 in Delaware
I left some more concerns on the review page. PointsofNoReturn (talk) 20:01, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of U.S. Route 13 in Delaware
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article U.S. Route 13 in Delaware you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Coemgenus -- Coemgenus (talk) 13:41, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of U.S. Route 13 in Delaware
The article U.S. Route 13 in Delaware you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:U.S. Route 13 in Delaware for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Coemgenus -- Coemgenus (talk) 13:21, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Interstate 95 in Delaware
The article Interstate 95 in Delaware you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Interstate 95 in Delaware for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PointsofNoReturn -- PointsofNoReturn (talk) 02:42, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Route 54 (Delaware–Maryland)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Route 54 (Delaware–Maryland) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Guerillero -- Guerillero (talk) 01:20, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Route 54 (Delaware–Maryland)
The article Route 54 (Delaware–Maryland) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Route 54 (Delaware–Maryland) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Guerillero -- Guerillero (talk) 03:21, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

User:Rschen7754/USRD GA audit
Hi! I haven't asked you about this in a while, but I've noticed that you've made a lot of changes to various GAs. Are you going off this list and/or do you have any that I should look at to remove from the list? --Rschen7754 04:31, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Right now I am going through my older Maryland GAs and redoing the history sections with better sources. In addition, I am using abbreviations for routes throughout the article and cutting out speed limits, the latter you noted as a concern in your audit.  Dough 48  72  04:37, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Ah, okay. Just let me know when you have some for me to look at. --Rschen7754 04:52, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

List of toll roads in the United States
My feelings on adding the toll banner on top of the highway markers makes it look redundant and would prefer if they were not included to make the page more clean. Exception being the signs that have toll in them. But that's just me, do you think it's absolute to identify as such on a toll list? --WashuOtaku (talk) 23:17, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I just added them because that's how the route is signed.  Dough 48  72  23:26, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, it's an answer. --WashuOtaku (talk) 23:31, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maryland Route 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Severn River. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Interstate 495 (Delaware)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Interstate 495 (Delaware) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Yoshi24517 -- Yoshi24517 (talk) 22:40, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Interstate 495 (Delaware)
The article Interstate 495 (Delaware) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Interstate 495 (Delaware) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Yoshi24517 -- Yoshi24517 (talk) 19:41, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of U.S. Route 301 in Delaware
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article U.S. Route 301 in Delaware you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AHeneen -- AHeneen (talk) 15:20, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of U.S. Route 301 in Delaware
The article U.S. Route 301 in Delaware you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:U.S. Route 301 in Delaware for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AHeneen -- AHeneen (talk) 17:00, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of U.S. Route 301 in Delaware
The article U.S. Route 301 in Delaware you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:U.S. Route 301 in Delaware for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AHeneen -- AHeneen (talk) 01:41, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Delaware Route 279
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Delaware Route 279 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caponer -- Caponer (talk) 01:41, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Delaware Route 279
The article Delaware Route 279 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Delaware Route 279 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caponer -- Caponer (talk) 02:01, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Delaware Route 279
The article Delaware Route 279 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Delaware Route 279 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caponer -- Caponer (talk) 02:41, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

The Center Line: Winter 2015

 * —MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of 18:37, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Henderson Mill Road
Your comments supporting the deletion of the above referenced article were made prior to the completion of recent additions and improvements. If possible, please revisit the article for further review, with whatever comments you might have towards the improvement of this article... and any confirmation/reconsideration of your earlier opinion supporting deletion. Gulbenk (talk) 02:46, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

U.S. Route 59
Why did you revert my edit on U.S. Route 59? I already had noted that I-369/US 59 travel concurrently from Tenaha to Texarkana (the I-30 interchange). Allen (Morriswa) (talk) 23:55, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I-369 is only built in Texarkana so far the remainder is still a future road. The major intersections should reflect current conditions.  Dough 48  72  01:11, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kutztown seal.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Kutztown seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:39, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Enough
Please stop with the disruptive nominations for deletion. This is considered vandalism. If this activity continues, you will be blocked for the day. Nakon 03:10, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
 * On what grounds? As far as I can see, everything Dough is doing is within the April Fools Day guidelines, which were created with consensus. I remember that RfC well; there was a clear consensus against banning April Fools Day jokes entirely. This case should be no different. Lighten up. T  C  N7 JM  03:24, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Pennsylvania Route 12
Which source says that PA 12 was designated in 1999? --NE2 15:57, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The 1999 map of Berks County shows PA 12 designated along its current alignment. From that we know it was designated "by 1999" and I have changed the wording accordingly to reflect what is known from the source.  Dough   4872   00:11, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Oh crap, found a source that says December 1998. --NE2 00:52, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the find!  Dough   4872   01:02, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

GAR
New Jersey Route 185, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. --Rschen7754 23:49, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Pennsylvania Route 984
Hello, if you have any way to look up an answer, could you help me understand why you redirected Pennsylvania Route 984 to Pennsylvania Route 866? This was four years ago, so I'm assuming that you won't remember the details. Nyttend (talk) 03:27, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * PA 984 was a former designation a section of road that later became PA 866.  Dough   4872   03:31, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

The Center Line: Spring 2015

 * —MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 12:11, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Interstate 295 (Delaware–New Jersey)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Interstate 295 (Delaware–New Jersey) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rschen7754 -- Rschen7754 (talk) 17:00, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Interstate 295 (Delaware–New Jersey)
The article Interstate 295 (Delaware–New Jersey) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Interstate 295 (Delaware–New Jersey) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rschen7754 -- Rschen7754 (talk) 18:40, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Interstate 295 (Delaware–New Jersey)
The article Interstate 295 (Delaware–New Jersey) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Interstate 295 (Delaware–New Jersey) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rschen7754 -- Rschen7754 (talk) 04:01, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

GAR
New Jersey Route 181, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. --Rschen7754 04:23, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Delaware State Route System
Materialscientist (talk) 13:20, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Delmarlogo.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Delmarlogo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 14:25, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Delaware State Route System
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Delaware State Route System you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rcsprinter123 -- Rcsprinter123 (talk) 19:21, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:5-hour Energy 200 Dover fall logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:5-hour Energy 200 Dover fall logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:13, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Alt. 20 Indiana
I just noticed that when you created Bannered routes of U.S. Route 20 you included a blank section for a former alternate route in Indiana. I assume that you saw a source somewhere that included one along U.S. 12, possibly to compensate U.S. 20's move south to its own alignment, but this is the first that I've ever heard of it – I just did some searching, even rechecking WP:USRD/AASHTO in case I missed something subtle, but found nothing except the article text. Mapsax (talk) 15:05, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
 * If it never existed, remove it.  Dough   4872   04:04, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
 * What info did you have showing that it might have? That would be my lead. Mapsax (talk) 14:45, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I likely copied the information from somewhere else on Wikipedia that had a US 20 ALT listed in Indiana. This source indicates the route existed but it is a SPS and should not be used. If better sources can be found to verify whether this route actually existed then they should be used.  Dough   4872   15:54, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Of course. I should've checked that page first. I just sent an e-mail to the webmaster of this site because I know that he has an extensive set of old Indiana maps. Mapsax (talk) 17:42, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
 * OK, it's been two months, and I've found out two things:
 * There is no reference to this routing on any of the USGS quads in their historical database. However, there is reference to a routing through Osceola and Elkhart (1:24000s, Osceola 1958/Elkhart 1961). Subsequently, I deleted the Michigan City route from the page and combined the Osceola and Elkhart entries, assuming that they referred to the same single routing that I found. I didn't put any info at the latter yet, though, because the topos show the routing as ALT 20, not TRUCK 20, plus USGS tends not to be very reliable with numbered routes in general. (Incidentally that routing is not listed at the us-highways.com page linked above.)
 * We all now have an extensive set of old Indiana maps at our disposal: I just found Indiana Memory's online collection, and have updated WikiProject U.S. Roads/Indiana/Resources/Maps accordingly. While I'm elated, it also reminds me that the state has historically not maintained auxiliary routes other than alternates and splits, so even if the former routing did exist it probably wouldn't have shown up on their official maps (in fact, I haven't found either routing on any yet), so it not being identified wouldn't necessarily mean that it didn't exist; I know of others that have existed, even recognized by AASHTO, that have never appeared on them. It would be nice to have the AASHO numbering document archive go back that far just for comparison.
 * What do you think? Worth a mention at WT:USRD? Mapsax (talk) 16:30, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Yeah, maybe get more feedback from the project.  Dough   4872   19:17, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

I don't understand the question. –Fredddie™ 21:04, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
 * [Really trying not to hijack another's talk page] The initial question was "Did this route ever exist?" Mapsax (talk) 21:23, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Delaware State Route System
The article Delaware State Route System you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Delaware State Route System for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rcsprinter123 -- Rcsprinter123 (talk) 20:41, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Turnipike to NJ 49
SLDIAG shows NJ Turnpike maintenance to NJ 49. Thus, for the very same reason you have exit 72 listed, you must keep NJ 49 listed. Famartin (talk) 03:29, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Question about 206 Bypass editing
Dough4872...

I do not understand why you removed my quoted information from an NJ DOT employee and then posted an article that simply has someone quoting a NJ DOT Employee. We both had the same sources and both could be considered hearsay in that case.

The email to me from NJ DOT...

"...told by the Project Manager that the current contract, Contract C, is performing some earthwork and utility relocation work in advance of the next (and hopefully final) contract, which is anticipated to begin construction in 2017. The entire roadway is anticipated to be open to traffic by the year 2020. Please keep in mind that funding and time frame for construction of the next contract  is dependent on the Transportation Trust Fund."
 * Emails are not a reliable source, therefore the article should be used instead.  Dough   4872   14:16, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

I am glad you found an article. But that article has information based on an email from NJ DOT....same as the information I had. So if I write an article and say what I said in the wiki page...and then site that article...that makes it OK? (I am just confused as to what you are deciding is a valid source vs not since both are the same source of information. And who's to say information needs to be "published" in an article to be true?  In fact, an article can have false information at times).Billy Wiki Man (talk) 17:29, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

List of crossings of the Schuylkill River
Thank you for your excellent work on List of crossings of the Schuylkill River. Early in my active creation for Philadelphia articles, I created several bridge articles in Philadephia, and added several photographs I took of bridges, but I have not done much on these articles in a long time, so I am pleased to see your efforts. Do you ever create bridge articles?--DThomsen8 (talk) 15:02, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Generally no, I usually stick to road articles.  Dough   4872   15:05, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

626 in Virginia
I am creating an article in my sandbox User:Dthomsen8/sandbox/Gray's Creek, and I need to identify a road 626 in Surry County, Virginia, and create a Wikilink if possible. Can you help me with that road?--DThomsen8 (talk) 21:07, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 626 is probably a secondary road and can be spelled as "State Route 626". A wikilink is not needed since these types of roads are generally not notable enough for their own articles.  Dough   4872   21:34, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

The Center Line: Summer 2015

 * —MediaWiki message delivery (talk) delivered on behalf of Imzadi1979 05:23, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sierra Vista Mall (5th nomination)
I've seen you in a few mall discussions before; care to weigh in here? Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:54, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

The Center Line: September 2015
  Volume 8, Issue S1 • September 2015 • About the Newsletter
 * Happy 10th Anniversary!

1=

• USRD through the years

• A goal for success

• From the first spinning cogs to controlling the power of the moon 1=

• Article assessment over time

• How to measure a WikiProject's load

• Conflict over article titles 1=

• Arbitration case closes

• Collaboration

• Our valued contributors

 Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
 * —delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 (talk) on 23:58, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:The Simpsons episode count
Template:The Simpsons episode count has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 05:45, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Old Draft
Hi there. I was poking around draft space and noticed that Draft:Dale Earnhardt a page you made a singular edit to on January 4th of 2014 hasn't been edited in a very long time. Did you forget about it? Is it still needed? If you could take the time to resolve it's status, that would be great. Thank you. Hasteur (talk) 17:23, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I was going to work on improving the article a while ago but never got around to it. You can get rid of it.  Dough   4872   22:45, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Dale Earnhardt
Draft:Dale Earnhardt, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Dale Earnhardt and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Dale Earnhardt during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 21:07, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Thank you
Wanted to drop by to thank you for stepping up on those GANs. Lack of computer/internet access has plagued me these past few months. I'm moving back to Toronto so hopefully I'll be active again in the coming weeks. Again though, thank you :) -  Floydian  τ ¢  17:39, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * You're welcome, just wanted to help out and make sure those articles passed.  Dough   4872   22:12, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Njmc.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Njmc.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:23, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia email re Newspapers.com signup
HazelAB (talk) 15:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 23 November
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 * On the 2015 NASCAR Sprint Cup Series page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=692103910 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F692103910%7C2015 NASCAR Sprint Cup Series%5D%5D Ask for help])

NASCAR standards proposal
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:2015_NASCAR_Sprint_Cup_Series. Thanks. –  Nascar1996  ( talk • cont ) 01:44, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

The Center Line: November 2015
  Volume 8, Issue 4 • November 2015 • About the Newsletter

1=
 * Departments

• Assessment roundup

• Portal selected articles and pictures

• KML Corner 1=
 * Features

• Constructing a road junction list

• WikiConference USA 2015

• The Junction template and you

• Harnessing map archives 1=
 * State and national updates

• State updates

• In other project news...

 Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
 * —delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of on 22:59, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Delaware Route 1
Dude,

The work you have done is amazing. I was researching Delaware Route 1, and was blown away by the detail. Thank you!

Listserv (talk) 02:29, 16 December 2015 (UTC) 