User talk:Doughnuthead

Why should you be unblocked in any way? Look here; it contains a list of ALL of the socks you created. Not one. Not two. Not three. but SEVENTEEN of them. I remembered patrolling the user account creation log when *pop* came the account "MuzemikeSucksDick". You also created another account called "Philosopherisadick". You are giving the community here, especially CheckUsers and administrators, a rough time, because we have to deal with you. We will not forgive you for any of the disruption you have caused to the encyclopedia. Please, never create another sockpuppet again on Wikipedia unless you are sure you can conduct yourself in a mature fashion. -- Bryce  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 14:11, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

My statement...was arrogant? I was pointing out facts about your behavior on this site. And by the way, you won't achieve anything by calling users "a fool" and calling checkusers "stupid". That's all I'm going to say, as I don't want to get near feeding the trolls. -- Bryce  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 01:51, 13 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Due to continued trolling and socking threats, I've revoked Talk page access -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:39, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, and I reverted Doughnuthead's faking of the unblock acceptance -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:40, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Doughnuthead for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:48, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom unblock appeal
The Arbitration Committee has carefully considered the user's appeal and has declined to unblock at this time. After six months of not editing Wikipedia under any account including IP accounts the user may again apply to have the block reviewed.

For the Arbitration Committee.  SilkTork   ✔Tea time  18:43, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--RedBullWarrior (talk) 11:12, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Community ban
Per WP:CBAN and AN/I community decision on  6 August 2012, you are hereby informed that you are permanently banned from editing any part of this website for any reason whatsoever. If you feel this ban is unjust, you may appeal your case to the Arbitration Committee by email. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 20:15, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Yeah man, I agree, this use should be unblocked. 70.128.116.200 (talk) 00:46, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Unban request
This edit requested an unban. It used the unblock template, despite the fact you know your only avenue for unbanning is WP:BASC. However, as the unblock request was made by an IP address rather than someone signed in to this account, I have simply blanked it. Any further instances will result in this page being protected, though. --Yamla (talk) 15:10, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * This page has now been protected to prevent any further instances. --Yamla (talk) 15:20, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * The IP user, claiming to be Doughnuthead, continued to be abusive on their IP talk page and I had to revoke talk page access. If this really was Doughnuthead, they continue to show it would be breathtakingly inappropriate to lift the ban. --Yamla (talk) 15:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)