User talk:Dougieshaw

Nonsense of Libertonia
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Libertonia, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Libertonia provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Libertonia, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 14:17, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:CMYKForceAndFreedom.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:CMYKForceAndFreedom.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 15:06, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Libertonia
Hi,you can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~. I deleted your recent article because, even if it is not nonsense, it did not provide independent verifiable sources that it meets the notability guidelines. Nothing on Google, 100 people is not notable, and just an idea at best.  Jimfbleak . Talk to me. 19:36, 9 July 2007 (UTC)


 * One ref in one magazine doesn't establish notability, the absence of Google hits and the small number of people make it certain that any recreation will be deleted by an admin as non-notable. Also the facebook bit at the end is fairly spammy.  Jimfbleak . Talk to me . 09:22, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Ok, so I guess we need to wait till we go public with the project and its in all the press. We've been keeping it quite quiet up till now and until we do the land transaction with whichever government comes through with the best offer.(The facebook bit can easily be deleted, it was only in to prove the existence of other people that knew about the project.) Thanks for your help. By the way, where can I get a copy of the page with the tags so I dont have to redo everything when we get to the point where it is well known. Douglas J Shaw


 * text is here Jimfbleak 12:01, 11 July 2007 (UTC)