User talk:Douglasabaker

While your work is appreciated, the problems with Association of Executive Search Consultants include: lack of specificity - nearly any nonprofit organization can be described the way you described this group. What specifically do they do? History. What have they done? What laws have they helped to change? What differences in the practice of headhunting have they sucesssfully promoted? Structure: Who are their members? Indiviuals or companies? How is the group financed? Donations, fees - for what services? The most important way to show the group is worthy of an article is to point to existing media coverage or other examples of published, independant analysis of the group. Has the Wall St. Journal had an article on them? Any or all of these improvements would greatly help the article. Right now it tetters very close to the edge of being too nonspecific, and lacking examples of exteranal notice, to be acceptable. Hope this helps. Please let me know (by editing this page, or my talk page) if you read this. JesseW, the juggling janitor 23:00, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Nomination of Association of Executive Search Consultants for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Association of Executive Search Consultants is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Association of Executive Search Consultants until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fiddle  Faddle  21:24, 5 November 2015 (UTC)