User talk:Douglasrmcdonald

Proposed deletion of Unguage
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Unguage, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ironholds 13:14, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Unguage
I have nominated Unguage, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Unguage. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ironho<b style="color:#696969">ld</b><b style="color:#000">s</b> 13:23, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. <b style="color:#D3D3D3">Ir</b><b style="color:#A9A9A9">on</b><b style="color:#808080">ho</b><b style="color:#696969">ld</b><b style="color:#000">s</b> 13:26, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Kinichk article
No, actually. The problem isn't just the tone, but that it comes out with wide, sweeping and possibly libel-inducing paragraphs with no references. Your "valid concern" is wholly biased without some kind of valuable reference, and the fact that the rest of the article reads like a student guide is hardly helpful. We're creating an encyclopedia, not a handbook; adding (for example) email addresses for contact is not part of that.<b style="color:#D3D3D3">Ir</b><b style="color:#A9A9A9">on</b><b style="color:#808080">ho</b><b style="color:#696969">ld</b><b style="color:#000">s</b> 11:02, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry about the Defence/Defense thing, btw; I'm a brit, it came naturally :P. <b style="color:#D3D3D3">Ir</b><b style="color:#A9A9A9">on</b><b style="color:#808080">ho</b><b style="color:#696969">ld</b><b style="color:#000">s</b> 13:18, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Something referenced and with a more neutral tone? I can help out if you'd like. <b style="color:#D3D3D3">Ir</b><b style="color:#A9A9A9">on</b><b style="color:#808080">ho</b><b style="color:#696969">ld</b><b style="color:#000">s</b> 13:23, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * At the moment things like previous alumni (if you can reference it), history, so on. Building layout isn't that useful for the moment. <b style="color:#D3D3D3">Ir</b><b style="color:#A9A9A9">on</b><b style="color:#808080">ho</b><b style="color:#696969">ld</b><b style="color:#000">s</b> 13:29, 2 October 2008 (UTC)