User talk:Dov Henis

Tim, Thanks for the welcome. However, seems that my joining is a mistake: (1) My postings are not meant-intended to be part of a discussion; they posit my comprehension of their subjects. (2) I am not interested in serving Wikipedia as a messenger collecting published information for it, but ONLY in suggesting my own personal comprehensions. I have tens of essays positing own pesonal comprehensions of a variety of life-evolution-culture subjects. Respectfully, Dov Henis (retired,'56 Biochem PhD Un of Pittsburgh, Pgh PA USA) Dov Henis (talk) 00:39, 6 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi Dov. It does indeed seem that your joining was a mistake. The discussion pages here are for discussion only, and the articles are for well sourced mainstream information, NOT for original research. You might like to read this page and this one too. I hope that you consider staying around and making edits according to the conventions and intentions of this encyclopedia, but otherwise, please do not introduce your own original research. This is not the place for it, and it will be removed. garik (talk) 14:57, 13 August 2008 (UTC)


 * }

July 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Tim Vickers (talk) 15:58, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Molecular geometry
Your recent edit to Molecular geometry was clearly inappropriate as it was right at the top of the article and its relevance is not clear. I have moved it to the talk page Talk:Molecular geometry, as someone might have a way of using this material appropriately. --Bduke (talk) 07:25, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

August 2010
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did to survival of the fittest, dark matter, and talk:faster-than-light, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Christopher Thomas (talk) 19:09, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

October 2011
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Energy, you may be blocked from editing. JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 13:49, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

May 2012
I've undone your recent addition to Astrobiology. Were you intending to add that to the discussion page (talk:Astrobiology)? Vsmith (talk) 01:06, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Wikipedia:Help desk, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Roger (talk) 09:36, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at List of particles, you may be blocked from editing. Meters (talk) 23:07, 11 November 2012 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 23:10, 11 November 2012 (UTC)