User talk:Download/Archives/2012/January

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:46, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks!
Hi Download, I don't think we've interacted on page edits before. Thanks for the barnstar for diligence! Reading a bit around your user pages gives a glimpse into an entirely different world, though certainly one where diligence reigns. Best wishes, Nadiatalent (talk) 01:12, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Pomegranate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Bureau of Plant Industry


 * Stanozolol (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Schedule III

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you.  - down  load  ׀  talk  01:17, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Just so you know
There has been a discussion on my talk page at User talk:Moe Epsilon related to the Adolph Rupp article and the editor, User:Jbfwildcat, you have reverted. It seems to be consistent pattern in the editors behavior. If you had any further opinion about it, feel free to comment. If you don't, that is quite alright as well, I was just letting you know since you were the one who reverted. — Moe   ε  06:00, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Moe, I took a better look at the article and it seems like there is some edit warring and disagreement going on. I am not sure what exactly to do other than to try to conform to Wikipedia's policies on NPOV.   -  down  load  ׀  talk  20:04, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Statin
On statin you added a most unsuitable source to support the assertion in the intro that statins are used for the prevention of cardiovascular disease. The source (from a website about cholesterol) was actually a page that made unsourced and highly debatable and irresponsible claims about statins and cancer. In truth, most very large statin trials have now shown that the risk of cancer is unchanged or even improved. Please adhere to WP:NPOV when selecting sources, and make sure that for medical articles you use sources that meet the criteria from WP:MEDRS. JFW &#124; T@lk  10:34, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi JFW, thanks for looking over it more closely. When I was researching it did seem like more of a large and authoritative site but it looks like I'm wrong.  Thanks for the advice!  -  down  load  ׀  talk  20:02, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Okay.
We are having an disagreement about if school government officials are noteable figures. Let me point you to another page where they are listed and have been listed for a long time. It is also a YRDSB high school from the area.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sir_William_Mulock_Secondary_School — Preceding unsigned comment added by Voldemorto (talk • contribs) 04:39, 10 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Not a relevant argument, and I've removed the names of those non-notables, per Wikipedia guidelines.

76.248.147.199 (talk) 04:41, 10 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Hello Voldemorto, we are not having a disagreement about whether they are notable enough, but rather about the template (overly detailed) that was added to the page. Personally, I agree that it is overly detailed and the other editor who added it appears to agree; however, your reverting of the consensus is on the verge of violating WP:Edit warring.  Additionally, this edit summary by you, "Don't we live in a free and democratic society? You're seriously hurting my freedom of speech." is completely out of place.  Secondly, just because these school government students have been listed on another article "for a long time" does not make them notable.  They can very easily be removed if they are deemed not to be notable.  I can point you to hundreds of high school articles without the school government listed.   -  down  load  ׀  talk  04:45, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Let me ask you. What do you have against publicizing some hard working students who do a lot for the school which the page is dedicated for? As well as showing the importance of the school's student council, with a yearly budget of over $45,000? It really doesn't make sense. The student council is what makes the school. The students make the student council: they deserve an honourable mention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Voldemorto (talk • contribs) 04:44, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * "Hard working" has nothing to do with notability. There are billions of "hard working" individuals in the world; are they all notable enough to have an entry on Wikipedia?   -  down  load  ׀  talk  04:46, 10 January 2012 (UTC)


 * I understand that comment was out of place, because it was a joke. You gotta learn to live a little. Are you getting paid to sit on your computer and monitor Wikipedia pages? No. Are you having fun telling some new Wikipedia newbie that he is wrong? Yes. There is a problem with that. Why don't you go do something that really matters instead of sitting on your ass, eating deep fried garbage and creeping Wikipedia. Get a girlfriend. Get a job. Go to school. Honestly, just let it go for once. You've probably never lost an argument on here. What a dedicated un-paid wikipedia member you are. Really great job. Also, UMAD?

--Voldemorto (talk) 04:52, 10 January 2012 (UTC)


 * I find Voldemorto's edits disruptive, and will request administrative assistance. 76.248.147.199 (talk) 04:53, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * (This is the message I composed earlier:) Also, to add to that, if the students are trusted with control of a yearly budget of $45,000+, you should probably mention that to support notability. For now I recommend you take the issue to the article's talk page.  -  down  load  ׀  talk  04:54, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * It seems to me that you are the one who is mad. As I said earlier, I never told you that you are wrong, but rather told you my opinion on the matter and advised you on Wikipedia guidelines.   -  down  load  ׀  talk  04:56, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Now we're getting to some conflict resolution. Thanks for that. Will do. As mentioned in the article, BOSS acts as an umbrella and provides funding. These students have the difficult job of distributing it. Sorry for any rude comments, I just get overwhelmed easily and It's my first day on Wikipedia. You're probably a good guy. --Voldemorto (talk) 05:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Alright - but I can't guarantee that the thing about their budget will make it completely notable. I still recommend taking it to the talk page first before this situation gets blown into an edit war.   -  down  load  ׀  talk  05:04, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Just to add to that, there already appears to be a discussion here: Talk:Thornhill_Secondary_School  - down  load  ׀  talk  05:06, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Revert on This Means War (Attack Attack! album)
Hello.

It appears that you have reverted my edit on This Means War (Attack Attack! album) (see ). It appears that you intended to revert, but had accidentally reverted my edit instead.

He had blanked a section from the page without explanation. I had reverted it. My reversion was reverted as vandalism.

Please let me know if you believe that I had violated any policy, although I had made my edit in good faith.

By the way, had removed my warning from User talk: 24.218.18.76 believing that it was invalid, but I am assuming that was a mistake.

Thanks. 75.53.212.214 (talk) 02:44, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, I have removed the warning from your talk page and restored the content. However, since the information is questionable, I have added citation needed to the statement as there is no reliable source that is cited.   -  down  load  ׀  talk  02:49, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The information isn't "questionable" its pure vandalism by someone who is smarter than your average vandal. I've reverted it. - Jer Hit me up 02:53, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks Jer - this threw me off at first as it was another IP who added the statement in the first place.  -  down  load  ׀  talk  02:55, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks to everybody for your clarifications. 75.53.212.214 (talk) 03:52, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I have reverted myself on that warning. Was a mistake on my end. Calabe1992 03:58, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I suppose the warning can be kept on User talk: 24.218.18.76 since he did not explain his revert, but, as mentioned above, he removed a bad faith addition made by a clever vandal. It was said above by Jer757 "The information isn't "questionable" its pure vandalism by someone who is smarter than your average vandal." With that being said, his edit was actually in good faith, even though he did not explain his removal of content.


 * It is advisable to always explain removals, as, often times, content is removed maliciously, but, again, in this case, based on the information which I have now, the removal was done for a legitimate reason.


 * Thanks. 75.53.212.214 (talk) 04:04, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Good lord, I think I get all of this now. ;) Calabe1992 04:06, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Ahlfors theory
Hello,

your edit at Ahlfors theory was not quite constructive. If you have a short look, you will see that the copyright violation tag placed by the bot was an obvious bot error (about which I have alerted the owner already). Messages of the kind you placed at User_talk:Pym1507 are quite discouraging for a new editor who has made a very valuable contribution to the mathematics project. It would be nice if you remove the template from his user page.

Best, Sasha (talk) 00:33, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello Sasha, my mistake. Though I don't quite remember this revert that I made, I just started using STiki to revert vandalism today and am not used to the way the diffs are displayed - it appeared as though Pym1507 blanked the entire page.  Thanks for noticing it, and I will remove the warning right now.   -  down  load  ׀  talk  00:36, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * thanks (and sorry for the aggressive tone, it is the second template regarding the same page on Ahlfors theory, so I got a bit annoyed).
 * Best regards, Sasha (talk) 00:39, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Vandalism
By vandalism, do you mean "knowingly editing in information that is false"?

Because I'm not. I've seen witches in the Conservation area. 99.225.44.141 (talk) 01:31, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Cite a reliable source then.  -  down  load  ׀  talk  04:19, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

STiki
Hi Download,

Have you tried WP:STiki? I came across you though your edit to Entrepreneurship and found that you do quite a bit of anti vandalism work. STiki has a much simpler interface than Huggle, which puts some people off, but the its main advantage is that it uses a queueing system to feed you stuff with a high probability of being vandalism that no one else is looking at.

Yaris678 (talk) 08:39, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Yaris, never heard of STiki; thanks for introducing me to it! Will definitely give it a try today.   -  down  load  ׀  talk  23:52, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Wow, just gave it a try and it seems like a much higher percentage of the changes I see are vandalism. I will definitely be using STiki in the future!  Thanks for letting me know about it. :p  -  down  load  ׀  talk  00:19, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * No problem.
 * If you are intersted, there's some stuff on the page WP:STiki that explains why it has a high hit rate.
 * Spread the word!
 * Yaris678 (talk) 10:54, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Tactical (disambiguation)
What made you think the change I made was test/vandalism ? I note that when you reverted my change you were making an edit approximately every 3 seconds! Please take a lot more care - especially before reverting edits that have an edit summary. DexDor (talk) 08:01, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi DexDor, I apologize - my mistake. Yesterday was my first day using WP:STiki (switched from Huggle) to revert vandalism and I don't think I noticed the edit summaries.  I will definitely pay more attention in the future.   -  down  load  ׀  talk  23:13, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * No probs. You might want to check your revert at CopyBot. Keep up the good work. DexDor (talk) 23:22, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Baked Alaska
Just to let you know - you reverted my edit on this article and warned me for vandalism - If you have a look I think you'll find my edit was not unconstructive. Another editor has now put it back to the last unvandalised (my) version. Vrenator    talk   11:00, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Vrenator, definitely my mistake for that, sorry. Don't know why I didn't notice the SpongeBob thing, but I guess it was the huge removal of content.  :P  -  down  load  ׀  talk  19:58, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Your input is needed on the SOPA initiative
Hi Download,

You are receiving this message either because you expressed an opinion about the proposed SOPA blackout before full blackout and soft blackout were adequately differentiated, or because you expressed general support without specifying a preference. Please ensure that your voice is heard by clarifying your position accordingly.

Thank you.

Message delivered as per request on ANI. -- The  Helpful  Bot  16:28, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you.  - down  load  ׀  talk  20:01, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Bullfighting has been completely abolished in all of Catalonia beginning from January 1, 2012.
Bullfighting has been completely abolished in all of Catalonia beginning from January 1, 2012. The anti-bullfighting cities in Catalonia have become superfluous as a result, because in Catalonia they have reached their aim, and the ban binds the entire autonomous community of Catalonia.

There are now other anti-bullfighting cities in Spain, in regions outside the autonomous communities of Catalonia and the Canary Islands, where bullfighting is not banned and where a ban by these cities may either be restricted to those particular cities or may only be symbolic (meaning no legal status). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.224.158.168 (talk) 23:30, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I see - thanks for the clarification.  -  down  load  ׀  talk  23:33, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I have corrected the mistaken revert by ClueBot NG.  -  down  load  ׀  talk  23:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

San Juan High School
I noticed that you gave me two warnings  for my good faith revisions on San Juan High School. Is there any particular reason for this? Or is there a technical problem with STiki? -Cntras (talk) 00:21, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Cntras, I don't think the edit summary was displayed (or I might have not noticed it) so I took it as removal of content and reverted. Sorry about that,  -  down  load  ׀  talk  00:23, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * In any case, the correct notification would be . But nevermind. -Cntras (talk) 01:17, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, when I use Huggle I do manually choose the "removal of content" warning but unfortunately in STiki there is only a vandalism/test option. If I have time I'll suggest it as an improvement. Regards,  -  down  load  ׀  talk  01:20, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Sexting in suburbia
I came across this article myself (and wasn't very impressed). I thought that it ought to be deleted, but none of the speedy deletion criteria were satisfied. I looked at WP:CSD and it does not mention movies. I remember tagging software for A7 and getting a telling off from an admin. I even raised the discussion on WT:CSD and was shot down in flames. I was wondering: have you seen movies deleted per A7 before? — Fly by Night  (  talk  )  03:10, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Fly by Night, I'm not very experienced in CSD myself as I only occasionally tag new articles that pop up while I'm reverting vandalism in Huggle. I just took a look at the criteria and you are right - it does not seem to mention movies.  However, since the notability of the subject isn't asserted (and there wasn't a better choice) I just chose the A7 tag.  Regards,  -  down  load  ׀  talk  03:14, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, good luck. Like I said: I've had my fingers burnt trying to apply the spirit of the rule. Hopefully a patrolling admin will see sense and do the right thing. All the best. — Fly by Night  (  talk  )  03:19, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Download, I see you have reverted my edit on the bluegill page
I really don't feel that section is necessary. Firstly, the section is poorly written (I have already mentioned this several months ago on the talk page with no one responding). It talks mostly about what's going on in Minnesota. It doesn't add any relevant bluegill specific information to the page and might confuse people as to creel limits (is that what is meant by "population limit"?) and harvesting method regulations in their respective states. While the large mouth bass, Small mouth bass, crappie, walleye, and channel catfish are much more important game fish, their pages don't have a conservation section, and I think rightly so. If you can completely rework the section and have it cover conservation of bluegill on a national level, I say let's keep it. However, I tried to do that before I deleted it and could not find a reference that spoke of their conservation on a national level. Please, get back to me. Josh--4.226.153.81 (talk) 15:54, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Josh, I did look over the section a bit but did not read over the talk page. Sorry for telling you to take it to the talk page in my edit summary.  Anyways, rereading the section it appears that the information might be important but I'm not really knowledgable of the topic, so if nobody else responded it's your call.  Regards,  -  down  load  ׀  talk  17:55, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Well, let me ask you this. What is the rule on having sections that only contain one sentence? The last sentence in the section is informative on a national level: "Each state has a department that regulates and manages bluegill population and sets fishing limits accordingly." When we are talking about a game fish such as bluegill, one that is of much less concern nationally and locally to regulating bodies and the general pubic than the "sexier" game species, that's really all I think should be said. The section above it only has one sentence in it, but I am not sure if that is kosher according to Wikipedia guidelines. The few sentences about culling the population to avoid over population and stunted growth apply to most any game species confined to a smaller body of water (ponds, smaller lakes). I could leave that in there after wording it better, but it's general fisheries management practice. Josh--4.226.153.81 (talk) 19:15, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't think there is any strict guideline against sections having only one sentence. Perhaps that last sentence could be moved into the lead/intro of the article?   -  down  load  ׀  talk  19:16, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks!
For reverting the vandalism in my sandbox! Jim1138 (talk) 20:46, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Glad to help :)  - down  load  ׀  talk  20:48, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:49, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

interwiki sorting with AWB
Any reason you moved bg after br here? Christian75 (talk) 07:37, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * (Talk page stalker) See this list; it's the order that will cause least confusion to the speakers of those languages. -- John of Reading (talk) 07:54, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Okey, thanks. I had seen it before and was just curious! Christian75 (talk) 16:13, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

-- John of Reading (talk) 07:54, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the notification!  - down  load  ׀  talk  19:07, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove refs
I ref every sentence I write. Else someone comes along and add a tag and by that point I may not remember where it is reffed to. Feel free to use so they do not show if you like. I have changed some and am doing this as standard practice now. Thanks -- Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:28, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the explanation, James. My reasoning was that there was already the same reference at the end of the paragraph so I didn't see the earlier ones as necessary but I'll leave them there for clarity. Regards,  - down  load  ׀  talk  22:30, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Another question
Where in the ref does it say "skin irritation, anal secretions, or discomfort"? And discomfort is sort of the same as rectal pain thus do not feel it is needed. Thanks. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:53, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi James, I actually did some research on hemorrhoids and a few sources listed those as symptoms. I suppose the reference already listed could be rearranged accordingly if those are to be kept in the article; otherwise, I'm not expert so feel free to remove them if you think they are inaccurate.   -  down  load  ׀  talk  22:56, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes I do not mind adding them just that I am uncomfortable having them before a ref that does not appear to support there addition. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2710774/?tool=pmcentrez I have found a textbook that will do the trick. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 23:01, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks!  -  down  load  ׀  talk  23:06, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Gilt-edged securities (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to National government


 * Statin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Inhibit


 * Sustanon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Athlete


 * Trenbolone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Athlete

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Meron, design theory
I reverted you on this page, as they were the author, and I've subsequently tagged it for deletion. Calabe1992 20:05, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Ah, alright, thanks. I've removed the warnings from the user's talk page.   -  down  load  ׀  email  20:07, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

HATE CRIME on Wiki
With all the talk from populations of sub-cultures indignant on creating "hate-crime" legislation and indoctrinating the whole of American society with their own flavor of "tolerance;" I trip over the first three words of this Constitution every time:  "We The People." So without belaboring my agenda I place a charge upon all "Wikipedia" users;" "Wikipedia Subscribers;" to include but not be limited to any and all "Wikipedia" user who holds a "Wikipedia Account" or an office employed by "Wikipedia" to take responsibility with me to end our tolerance for the definition of "Santorum" being published on this "Wikipedia" website. "Hate Crime" is in fact, "hate" and it cuts all directions.  Which in my opinion, would mean for the purpose of this charge that "you" the reader are accountable and responsible for the duration this filth remains on "Wikipedia."  I am confident there are man, only one other reader who would join with me in a "class-action lawsuit" against "Wikipedia" and the "authors" of "Santorum" as depicted and published here on Wikipedia.  Feel free to contact mailinglist at notinourbackyard dot org., if you wish to donate your time, your support, and any thing else that would further this charge. Studentat40 (talk) 21:22, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Notice of discussion at the Administrators' Noticeboard
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Request review of NLT block. Thank you. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 22:12, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the notice - don't really have much of a unique opinion but I do agree with the block. Thanks,  -  down  load  ׀  email  23:49, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space
Hey there Download, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Download/Sandbox.


 * See a log of files removed today here.
 * Shut off the bot here.
 * Report errors here.
 * If you have any questions, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:09, 28 January 2012 (UTC)