User talk:DoxDetective

Here is an change to my test page

Possibly doxxing detected on revision 902416219: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoxDetective&oldid=902416219

Test edit
This is another test edit --DoxDetective (talk) 15:24, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Test edit
This is a different test edit --DoxDetective (talk) 19:51, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Possible Doxxing Detected: Waiting for review
You are making far too many assumptions and are obvious on a mission - both dangerous things in Wikipedia. This idea you have that anyone who opposes your rhetorical flourishes is an apologist is arrant nonsense. We are working on a sentence to incorporate relevant data please try and work with other editors. But if these accusations continue and/or you don't work with other editors but simply edit war then its going to ANI - You are making far too many assumptions and are obvious on a mission - both dangerous things in Wikipedia. This idea you have that anyone who opposes your rhetorical flourishes is an apologist is arrant nonsense. We are working on a sentence to incorporate relevant data please try and work with other editors. But if these accusations continue and/or you don't work with other editors but simply edit war then its going to ANI - :With respect, WP:AGF applies to you as well. You are not accurately reading my mind and I am not on a mission. I am not arguing about mere rhetorical flourishes; instead I am suggesting that we favor plain language ("swastikas") instead of abstract language ("Nazi symbols"). I am proposing that this article on Martin Heidegger be updated to reflect the current broad consensus among scholars that the Heidegger apologists were (mostly) wrong and the current scholarly consensus regarding Heidegger's Nazism and antisemitism and how these influenced his philosophy. :With respect, WP:AGF applies to you as well. You are not accurately reading my mind and I am not on a mission. I am not arguing about mere rhetorical flourishes; instead I am suggesting that we favor plain language ("swastikas") instead of abstract language ("Nazi symbols"). I am proposing that this article on Martin Heidegger be updated to reflect the current broad consensus among scholars that the Heidegger apologists were (mostly) wrong and the current scholarly consensus regarding Heidegger's Nazism and antisemitism and how these influenced his philosophy. + ::It does and I'm doing my best to maintain it in the face of a series of insinuations from you over several edits. You are not proposing plain language but a high rhetorical style. Nothing in that last edit linked his Nazi practice to his philosophy. -   Yes, we have a Wikipedia article for the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. But we don't have one for Prof. Michael M. Wheeler. You're saying he must be right because he wrote this in 2011? But please be careful here, ; your statement that "Heidegger apologists are a real phenomenon beyond wikipedia" suggests that the problem begins with Wikipedia. Fellow editors may start to ask you to identify these so-called "Heidegger apologists". That might start to look like a personal attack on whoever you choose to name? Thanks. Yes, we have a Wikipedia article for the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. But we don't have one for Prof. Michael M. Wheeler. You're saying he must be right because he wrote this in 2011? But please be careful here, ; your statement that "Heidegger apologists are a real phenomenon beyond wikipedia" suggests that the problem begins with Wikipedia. Fellow editors may start to ask you to identify these so-called "Heidegger apologists". That might start to look like a personal attack on whoever you choose to name? Thanks. , contains_pii:True, pii_type:PERSON_NAME, } --DoxDetective (talk) 20:24, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Who was the Lisker Rebbe of the East Side of Manhattan who was caught with an intercom system pretending to know the problems of the people who came to see him? Who was the Lisker Rebbe of the East Side of Manhattan who was caught with an intercom system pretending to know the problems of the people who came to see him? + Huh?!  , contains_pii:True, pii_type:PERSON_NAME, } --DoxDetective (talk) 20:25, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Possible Doxxing Detected: Waiting for review
{user:{user}, namespace:{namespace}, bot:{bot}, comment:{comment}title:User talk:Ritchie333,, comment_text:  Line 73: Line 73: Hiya I am planning to put a couple of articles forward for good article review, therefore I thought I would in turn choose a couple of articles to review myself. Since I'm new to this, it seems a good idea to use the mentor scheme. I was wondering, would you be available to answer any questions I might have? I'm planning to get into it the week after next, so the beginning of July. Thanks for any help! Hiya I am planning to put a couple of articles forward for good article review, therefore I thought I would in turn choose a couple of articles to review myself. Since I'm new to this, it seems a good idea to use the mentor scheme. I was wondering, would you be available to answer any questions I might have? I'm planning to get into it the week after next, so the beginning of July. Thanks for any help!