User talk:Doyoumind111

Welcome!

Hello, Doyoumind111, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as No Such Thing As An Opinion: Can YOU Outsmart Me?, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Safiel (talk) 07:26, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of No Such Thing As An Opinion: Can YOU Outsmart Me?


A tag has been placed on No Such Thing As An Opinion: Can YOU Outsmart Me?, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Safiel (talk) 07:26, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Reliable sources
Please don't add information to articles that is not backed by reliable sources. Your blog is NOT a reliable source, and information sourced to it will be removed. Ravensfire ( talk ) 15:28, 10 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the response you left on my talk. For Wikipedia, blogs in general are not considered reliable sources.  Read the Reliable Source policy page for some of the reasons.  Putting together various sourced facts to draw a conclucsion that is not backed by a reliable sources is also not allowed.  That's called Original Research.  Frankly, it doesn't matter how smart you claim to be - if your views aren't published by a reliable sources, they aren't wanted in Wikipedia.  It's an encyclopedia, not a blog for people to announce their latest breathtaking discovery about why Obama can't be the President.  The information here must be backed by sources and cover the topic in a neutral manner.  I've linked to several of the major policy pages, plus your welcome message has several more.  It may be helpful for you to review some of them.  Thanks.  Ravensfire ( talk ) 16:47, 17 January 2011 (UTC)