User talk:Dp2222

The article Thumbthug has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:08, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

To NawlinWiki NawlinWiki

Please can you explain to me and the thousands of people out there who have experienced the same issue, the huge double standards that take place on wikipedia. The post you deleted is no different than a lot of other posts on this site. See as a reference. It seems to me that every post on this site is at the whim of the ego of the wiki editor in charge at that time. I am not asking for this page to be considered for inclusion if it is not a relevant page but i am asking for some solid standards and that every page be judged equally.


 * Cellufun is supported by reliable independent sources indicating its notability per WP:CORP. Thumbthug was supported only by its own press releases and blog entries.  Also, see generally WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:20, 3 March 2009 (UTC)