User talk:Dpetranker

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 04:49, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

David Petranker
This was a non-notable biography as per the criteria set out in WP:BIO. (aeropagitica) 08:22, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Timmy The Tiger.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Timmy The Tiger.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:08, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Mc_at_Work.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Mc_at_Work.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 04:25, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Jack_Wins1_small.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jack_Wins1_small.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:59, 1 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 01:59, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of David Petranker


The article David Petranker has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability; clearly an autobiography

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nyttend (talk) 00:21, 28 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Hey, bud, sorry to say your article you posted about yourself on the mainspace will not last long, though you're free to put it on your User page as you have. Cheers.--Milowent (talk) 02:01, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Can you please tell me what the difference is from my article, ok yes about myself in the third person and the articles of other photographers on here please do a search of current photographers - e.g Adam Ferguson, Emma Summerton, Walter Chin. I based my article around theres not promoting myself in any way not giving any details of competition etc. Just giving details about the work i do. And what do mean by code will stop deletion, what do i have to do to keep it up,

regards

David


 * For information: Adam Ferguson (photographer), Emma Summerton and Walter Chin are all now also proposed for deletion on the same grounds as David Petranker. Wikipeterproject (talk) 01:34, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

-

Further more, how much more notable do you want me to be I have work being exhibited around the world, I am Australia's leading mascot. cronulla shark, razorbacks, sydney fc, warratahs, west tigers. I am shooting such bands as Kiss, mental as Anything, poison, huey lewis and the news. I am also the main Photographer for Ferrari Australia. How much more do you want and especially when you see the way the other current photographers have there list. You guys have to have some kind of consistancy.


 * You will need to meet the criteria for inclusion of creative professionals, which is found at WP:CREATIVE. Among other things, you would need to be able to verify any of the following:
 * you, as a creative professional are regarded (by independent third parties) as an important figure or that you are widely cited by your peers (experts/notables in your field)
 * you are known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique
 * you have created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, that has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.
 * your work has become a significant monument, has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, has won significant critical attention, or is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums.


 * As you can see, it's not all that easy being notable. Even if you are a good photographer, which we have no reason to doubt.  Hope this helps to explain the nomination for deletion.  It's definately not personal.  Wikipeterproject (talk) 23:54, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of David Petranker


A tag has been placed on David Petranker, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of David Petranker and leave a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Wikipeterproject (talk) 23:38, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of David Petranker
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is David Petranker. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/David Petranker. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

FYI conflict of interest guideline
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia in David Petranker, User:Dpetranker, or other articles, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * see also: Wikipedia is not a soapbox and What may I not have on my user page?
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. — Athaenara ✉  03:15, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Mc at Work.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mc at Work.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — This, that and the other (talk) 12:53, 16 August 2014 (UTC)