User talk:Dpezzin

Nomination of John Pezzin for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Pezzin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/John Pezzin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Prevan (talk) 01:16, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sol-Lux


A tag has been placed on Sol-Lux, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. – Train2104 (t • c) 00:56, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fueling American Jobs
Hello Dpezzin,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Fueling American Jobs for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:45, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Farmer Veteran Coalition
Hi, I'm Kudpung. Dpezzin, thanks for creating Farmer Veteran Coalition!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please refrain from copying content from other websites. Write the article in your own words.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:51, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Lift For The 22
Hello, Dpezzin,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Lift For The 22 should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Lift For The 22.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Winged Blades Godric 08:37, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve One Fair Wage
Hi, I'm Babymissfortune. Dpezzin, thanks for creating One Fair Wage!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This page is tagged for two issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Happy New Year!!! Baby miss fortune 11:03, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Nonprofit articles
Hi Dpezzin. I noticed you've recently created a series of articles on American nonprofit organisations. Have you been paid for any of these articles? –&#8239;Joe (talk) 14:12, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

No, I have not been paid in any way. –&#8239;Dan (talk) 14:18, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Fueling American Jobs Coalition for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fueling American Jobs Coalition is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Fueling American Jobs Coalition until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 02:21, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of International Food Waste Coalition for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International Food Waste Coalition is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/International Food Waste Coalition until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 02:38, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to International Food Waste Coalition, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 03:43, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Paid editing
Another editor asked if you were receiving compensation for the articles about nonprofit organizations you have created. So far you have not responded to this question. What follows is the standard first notification about undisclosed paid editing. Please respond to this question before making any further edits - thanks.

Hello Dpezzin. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Dpezzin. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 04:53, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Alt-Libertarian
Hello Dpezzin,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Alt-Libertarian for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:01, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Libertarian Nationalism for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Libertarian Nationalism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Libertarian Nationalism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 20:36, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Alt-Libertarian
Hello, Dpezzin,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Alt-Libertarian should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Alt-Libertarian.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:28, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Please don't change other editor's posts
Please stop changing my posts. This is considered rude and disruptive. If you want to reply to my post, then reply to my post. But please stop changing my post. A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 23:50, 14 January 2018 (UTC)