User talk:Dpolancih

August 2022
Hello, I'm Visioncurve. An edit that you recently made to Beverly Hills Cop seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Visioncurve Timendi causa est nescire  07:41, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, appreciate your rescission if the format was not correct. The story I posted is a true story I think adds something however would be difficult to substantiate. Any tips on how it should be posted here? My father was an actual Detroit cop when the film was being made, and that is the actual origin story for the character's name. In the real example, Zig did not grant them usage of his name, hence the different spelling of Bogumil VS Bogomil Dpolancih (talk) 15:10, 13 August 2022 (UTC)


 * , hi. Your addition to the Beverly Hills Cop article actually had three problems, one of which begged for immediate attention. While it was surely a good faith edit, the first and foremost problem was that you added your paragraph to the wrong part of the page, after the reference list, which is not appropriate. There are a couple of useful suggestions in WP:MOS that you may want to familiarize yourself with before you proceed editing Wikipedia. Also, your addition was not backed by reliable sources. According to WP:VER, all material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists, and captions, must be verifiable. Wikipedia does not publish original research. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of editors. Even if you are sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. Lastly, and unfortunately, your paragraph was written poorly with several grammatical errors, and therefore it was, coupled with reasons mentioned above, deemed as unconstructive. Take care! Visioncurve  Timendi causa est nescire  05:37, 14 August 2022 (UTC)