User talk:Dpom581

October 2018
Hello, I'm Goodone121. I noticed that you recently removed content from 115th United States Congress without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Bettering the Wiki (talk) 05:44, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Weather Bill
I mean, it is objectively not major legislation. This is not a piece of legislation that was either substantively controversial, had a large economic or foreign policy impact as defined by CBO or JCT (like the Health Care Bill, Tax Bill, Budget Bills or Dodd-Frank revisions). Nor is there any explanation in the Wiki Page about why it IS major legislation. Best I can tell, it’s a Wiki writer’s pet interest and is a page that regurgitates the Congress.GOV explanation without even a good summary. Dpom581 (talk) 14:05, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Edit summaries in List of acts of the 118th United States Congress
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to List of acts of the 118th United States Congress did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder by setting, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! jhawkinson (talk) 18:01, 24 April 2024 (UTC)