User talk:Dr.Editorias

Dr Mark Merry moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Dr Mark Merry, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 13:24, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Progressive Liberty Party Australia


The article Progressive Liberty Party Australia has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Cannot find significant coverage in independent sources"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. buidhe 15:32, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Medal of Merit to Neringa's Municipality


The article Medal of Merit to Neringa's Municipality has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Independent coverage not found. No evidence of notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. buidhe 15:48, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Dr Mark Merry


The page Draft:Dr Mark Merry has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://www.yvg.vic.edu.au/about-yarra/about-mark-merry. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Deletion Review DMacks (talk) 16:21, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Progressive Liberty Party Australia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Progressive Liberty Party Australia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Progressive Liberty Party Australia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DMacks (talk) 23:32, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Your edits to Yarra Valley Grammar
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Yarra Valley Grammar, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Bookscale (talk) 05:40, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Progressive Liberty Party Australia. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Gogolwold (talk) 11:05, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

Your edits to Progressive Liberty Party Australia
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Progressive Liberty Party Australia, you may be blocked from editing. Bookscale (talk) 11:14, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

March 2020
One of your recent additions has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. Nick-D (talk) 09:56, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I've nominated the multiple images you've falsely claimed to be under Wikipedia friendly licences at Commons for deletion. I note that this involved you falsely claiming to have created the ADF's emblem. You will be blocked from Wikipedia if you continue this dishonest conduct. Nick-D (talk) 09:57, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add any further copyrighted images to Wikipedia. All images must be freely licensed, you cannot add any image that you find. Non-free images will be deleted and if you continue to ignore warnings you will likely be blocked. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 04:23, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Australian Labor Party National Executive, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Erickson. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Nth President
FYI, the US convention of "Nth President" is not used in the EU. Also, the president of the European Commission is not the president of the EU, there is no such post. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 14:51, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Daniel Andrews, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BA.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Annastacia Palaszczuk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palaszczuk Ministry.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cabinet of Australia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parliament House.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

49th Australian Labor Party National Conference moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to 49th Australian Labor Party National Conference. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:51, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Speaker of the Australian House of Representatives, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Presiding Officer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:39, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Hi Dr.Editorias! I have looked closely at your list of contributions and I can see that on 7th and 8th February 2020 you left an edit summary on each of your edits before hitting “Publish changes”. It appears that since 8 February 2020 you have not left an edit summary on any of your edits.

Leaving an edit summary shows other Users what you were trying to achieve with your edit, and why. Failing to leave an edit summary increases the likelihood that your edit will be reverted by another User, simply because that User is unable to determine whether your edit was made for a good purpose or for no sensible purpose at all.

Your edits have been subjected to reversion by multiple editors for various reasons. I recommend you read H:FIES and then always leave an edit summary before you hit “Publish changes”. It is one easy step that will help you avoid being reverted. Thank you. Dolphin ( t ) 00:44, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:49th Australian Labor Party National Conference
Hello, Dr.Editorias. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:49th Australian Labor Party National Conference, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:06, 5 February 2024 (UTC)