User talk:Dr. Rekhaa Kale

Speedy deletion of Acu-reiki
A tag has been placed on Acu-reiki, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. — BradV 18:39, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

I have edited it and removed the objectionable contents. Pl check and let me know!

Dr. Rekhaa Kale (talk) 18:52, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Past life healing
A tag has been placed on Past life healing, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. — BradV 18:41, 27 May 2008 (UTC) I have edited it and removed the objectionable contents. Pl check and let me know!

Dr. Rekhaa Kale (talk) 18:52, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Karyo
A tag has been placed on Karyo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. — BradV 18:41, 27 May 2008 (UTC) I have edited it and removed the objectionable contents. Pl check and let me know!

Dr. Rekhaa Kale (talk) 18:52, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

May 2008
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. — BradV 18:49, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Karyo
A tag has been placed on Karyo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. — BradV 18:51, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Guidelines
The recent articles you have created have been deleted because they do not meet our guidelines for inclusion in the encyclopedia. On the welcome page you will find some useful resources for how to contribute to this encyclopedia. Specifically, please be aware that advertising and original research are not encyclopedic in nature and do not belong on Wikipedia. If you have any questions about this, please leave comments here and I will respond. Thanks, and happy editing. — BradV 18:55, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing. Please read the welcome page before you edit again. — BradV 19:05, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Acu-reiki is an advertisement
The article Acu-reiki has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 19:11, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Bstone (talk) 19:14, 27 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Both of these last two are duplicate notices, so the final warning above still stands. — BradV 19:25, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Theory of independence of justice


The article Theory of independence of justice has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Essay, at best.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Drmies (talk) 02:24, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Theory of independence of justice


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Theory of independence of justice. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Independence of the judiciary. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Independence of the judiciary - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Safiel (talk) 02:46, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Theory of independence of justice
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Theory of independence of justice, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion notice, which will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 03:41, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dependency theory of justice


The article Dependency theory of justice has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Original research essay

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Safiel (talk) 04:45, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Dependency theory of justice


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Dependency theory of justice. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Independence of the judiciary. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Independence of the judiciary - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Kevin (talk) 05:10, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dependency theory of justice


The article Dependency theory of justice has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * this cites no sources and seems to be a personal essay or original research.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JohnCD (talk) 09:26, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Advice
I am sorry that your articles are getting deleted, but Wikipedia is not for what you are trying to do. It will save you trouble and wasted effort if you read: Regards, JohnCD (talk) 09:34, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * WP:No original research
 * WP:Verifiability
 * WP:What Wikipedia is not
 * I apologise for re-PRODding this article - I should have seen that you had already removed a Proposed Deletion notice, as you were quite entitled to do. I have therefore nominated the article at WP:Articles for deletion, formal notice below, which will start a discussion normally lasting seven days. You are welcome to contribute, but please read WP:No original research first. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 10:24, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Dependency theory of justice for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dependency theory of justice is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dependency theory of justice until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JohnCD (talk) 10:24, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of SYJC mumbai board study material


The article SYJC mumbai board study material has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:NOTHOWTO. This is not the way to communicate with your students.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jinkinson  talk to me   What did he do now?  04:32, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note that I've moved the article to your userspace, which may increase the chances of it not getting deleted. Bear in mind that Wikipedia is not a personal web host, however.  Ignatz mice•talk 04:38, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with SYJC mumbai board study material. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. --   LuK3      (Talk)   04:42, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of SYJC mumbai board study


The article SYJC mumbai board study has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not a message board.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 05:58, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

What Wikipedia is... and isn't...
Hi Dr Kale.

It appears that you are struggling to understand Wikipedia's purpose and what it is actually designed for. Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia, a reference work for anyone looking to find out information about a notable topic. It is not a platform for organising classes, providing study materials or course information, or communicating with students. Whilst Wikipedia does have an organised Education Program, this is designed to help students edit Wikipedia articles as part of their school or college courses, not to provide co-ordination for off-wiki teaching.

It would therefore be appreciated if you could stop trying to use Wikipedia to organise materials for your students. Whilst we welcome expert contributors such as yourself, we also have policies and guidelines regarding the content added and how the site is used; from your contributions to date, it appears that you have not looked over these, although the large blue template at the top of this page provides links to most of the pertinent pages. Expertise in a subject area does not excuse you from following the rules and process of this website when contributing here.

If you want to create an online reference page for your college, then I would suggest using Microsoft SharePoint or Google Docs instead; both are free to use and provide (and permit) information-sharing functions more appropriate to what you appear to want.

Regards, Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  09:06, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Ruthless Hasty Deletions made by you and your team
Hi,

Dear Yunshui,

It seems you never take pain to read the posts properly, and spped-jump to the conclusions with your own preconceived notions!

Please NOTE, I AM NOT INTERESTED IN CREATING ANY CLASS.

i AM JUST TRYING TO MAKE A COMPILED INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO STUDENTS.

But you people are so insensitive and ruthless that you do not even

Sensible editors always give breathing space for people who wish to help masses.

When I had put the please share posts under various subjects, DO YOU KNOW that I had created this article only after ensuring that people who are experts of respective subjects, already have easy to use study materials ready to upload??

AND FOR YOUR INFORMATION EACH OF THESE PERSON IS DOING THIS WITHOUT ANY EXPECTATION!

WE ARE NOT EVEN INTERESTED IN MAKING THE STUDENTS KNOW OUR NAMES!

WE JUST WANT THAT THEY GET STUDY MATERIALS EFFORTLESSLY!

This is because, the new textbooks of all subjects published by Mumbai Board have loads of errors and students get confused.

Even many guides created for monitory gains, carry similar mistakes.

As a result, students suffer.

So, I had created this article with a noble goal!

But it seems, Wikipedia has unfortunately appointed many insensitive editors like you!

If you had enough patience, you could have waited at least for the 7 days time mentioned earlier in the note placed before the article by someone else.....

But you are so impatient, that you did not even wait for 7 hours!

Is this the REAL WIKIPEDIA POLICY?

By the way,if the article is not reinstated gracefully, this post and all previous posts are heading towards press.

Regards,

Dr. Rekhaa Kale (talk) 09:30, 12 December 2013 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, but you are trying to use Wikipedia for something it is not intended for. Noble goals or not, numerous editors have told you, repeatedly, that what you are doing is not appropriate, and have made every effort to direct you to the site policies and guidelines that explain why. As much as you may want Wikipedia to be a platform for providing study materials to your students, that isn't what this website is for. I have directed you, in my message above, to two websites which are designed for the purpose you envisage; I'd recommend again that you use those. If you carry on disrupting Wikipedia we will have no choice but to block your access altogether. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  09:43, 12 December 2013 (UTC)