User talk:Dr. York's Truth

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Dirkbb (talk) 19:02, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Dwight York, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Liliana UwU (talk / contributions) 21:06, 14 May 2023 (UTC)  You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 21:13, 14 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The page contains biased sources of reference and information towards Malachi York's, misnomer (Dwight York)guilt. Court records showing Dr. York's innocence and the Conspiracy are not provided. Content is not fair and unbiased material. Dr. York&#39;s Truth (talk) 23:15, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not a soapbox for your theories of conspiracy. Articles are based on verifiable information, preferably as published in secondary sources. —C.Fred (talk) 13:22, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Court records in the docket file in USA vs York contain the affidavits of Dr. York's accusers in which they affirm the conspiracy against Dr. York. The is public records and Verifiable. Dr. York&#39;s Truth (talk) 13:29, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
 * And why was any of this not picked up in articles written about the trials? —C.Fred (talk) 13:32, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
 * The media outlets in particular AJC (The Atlanta Journal Constitution) and Macon Telegraph were quoted by the Trial Judge Charles Ashley Royal as being responsible for spoiling the Middle District of Georgia and the reason for the Change of Venue. This was in the Judges own motion October 20, 2003. Most of the articles were from these media outlets in the middle District of Georgia. Dr. York&#39;s Truth (talk) 13:45, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia if not showing the other side of view which are the facts that support Dr. York's innocence; then it is definitely a biased "soapbox." Dr. York&#39;s Truth (talk) 13:34, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
 * If "facts" support York's innocence, please show where he was acquitted in court. Wikipedia is not a platform to right great wrongs. —C.Fred (talk) 13:35, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Cases are overturned and "acquitted" years after following a wrongful conviction. A host of cases and innocent persons are found guilty, later to be exonerated. Dr. YORK maintains his innocence stands on it. Dr. York&#39;s Truth (talk) 13:49, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is a reference and research platform for members of the public. It should by all means inform the public of facts and allow them to draw their own conclusions. This is only fair. Our position is that Dr. York has not had a fair chance to tell his side of the story. His presumption of innocence which is a constitutional guarantee was destroyed before he ever stepped in a court of law by years of negative press. Have you ever heard Dr. York 3 hr interview on his case? Dr. York&#39;s Truth (talk) 13:59, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Reinstate my membership and allow me to present verifiable information concerning Dr. York's innocence. Dr. York&#39;s Truth (talk) 13:36, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
 * You were invited to provide secondary sources, and you didn't. Based on your statement above, Our position is that Dr. York has not had a fair chance…, please clarify your relationship with York and his staff, as it sounds like you may have a conflict of interest with York and/or be a paid editor. —C.Fred (talk) 02:57, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I am an independent researcher along with other researchers. Dr. York&#39;s Truth (talk) 17:44, 17 May 2023 (UTC)