User talk:Dr. ashlee g

Welcome!
Hello, Dr. ashlee g, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 00:46, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Getting started
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Recent edit to Miniature Pinscher
Hello, and thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to the Miniature Pinscher article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you! MrBill3 (talk) 20:02, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Miniature Pinscher, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. The cited source indicates they may have descended from German Standard Pinschers, so you'll need to provide a source if you're going to make a claim to the contrary—and it'll need to be a very reliable source to counter the current citation from the AKC. —C.Fred (talk) 00:46, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Hafspajen (talk) 01:26, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Hafspajen (talk) 14:16, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Recent edit to Miniature Pinscher
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Hafspajen (talk) 14:56, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. - Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:39, 19 May 2014 (UTC)