User talk:Dr.deisel

review this: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Before_I_Self_Destruct&action=history

BISD review.
Whether it's the actual album or not, the review itself is not allowed. It seems that it's you, and we have rules and guidelines, please see WP:ALBUMS and Template: Infobox Album to find rules and guidelines for professional reviews. Some examples include Rolling Stone, Allmusic, Entertainment Weekly, etc. --HELLØ    ŦHERE 22:35, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, you may want to check out this, and take your concerns to to the WP albums talk page and other respective pages. But it would be the same as if I began reviewing albums. We have established standards, and currently, this doesn't seem to meet them. I'm sorry. --HELLØ    ŦHERE 22:53, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Please read my above comment. You saying your writers have means nothing, you must be able to prove this. And, as I pointed out, it seems to be a meta account, which is normally not permitted. You do not have to go through me, you must go through the Wikipedia policies and standards. Take to the WikiProject talk pages and get some type of confirmation from them. --HELLØ    ŦHERE 23:01, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 22:42, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

March 2010
Please stop adding Planetill.com reviews. It does not fall into the sites used for professional reviews on albums. Thanks. Candyo32 (talk) 22:09, 21 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Agreed. It's just spam. I reverted it once, but I can't be bothered to follow him around and revert it all. It's very annoying to see someone plug (or defend) his web site with every edit. Maybe he could be banned or his URL blacklisted. 173.79.50.21 (talk) 20:41, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)