User talk:Dr.michaelcares

"Physicalitisation"
Hi. I have just deleted "Physicalitisation" as an improper re-creation of an article already deleted (repeatedly). See User talk:Askdrmichael. -- Hoary (talk) 11:18, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Physicalitise
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Physicalitise, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JohnCD (talk) 11:46, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Accurizer (talk) 11:52, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Hello, please realise the importance of this field of medicine. --Dr.michaelcares (talk) 12:47, 19 July 2008 (UTC)


 * If you believe that there was something wrong with this earlier discussion, or that it does not apply to your newer attempts to create an article with the same title, please argue your point as persuasively as you can at deletion review. -- Hoary (talk) 13:08, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Also, please read Wikipedia's guidelines on Verifiability, Notability, Neologisms, Advertisement and Conflict of Interest; and if you are the same person as, be aware that that use of more than one account by the same user is something that should be done with caution to avoid suspicions of "sockpuppetry" - click that link for more information. JohnCD (talk) 13:30, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Hello, please realise the importance of demonstrating that a subject on Wikipedia is notable. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 17:38, 20 July 2008 (UTC)