User talk:DrATStill

Osteopathic medicine in the United States
Please review WP:MOS. I'm going to have to revert many of your edits. Orange Marlin Talk• Contributions 05:45, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

As I understand it overall, the WIKI MOS requires that there be consistancy within an article, not necessarily consistancy across Wikipedia. To my knowledge, I have footnoted and original sourced everything. I did have trouble with dealing with the fact that the museum requires paid access to view the early copies of the Journal of Osteopathy - because of that, I linked to the museum login page and placed the direct link on Wiki as well. If you can elighten me about that or any other issue you find objectionable specifically - I'd sure appreciate it. Will be happy to make the changes. DrATStill (talk) 06:50, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of International Osteopathic Association
Hi there. Please ignore the speedy deletion tag - I slipped on the wrong article using PoinDexta1  |  Talk to Me  12:50, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problems with International Osteopathic Association
Hello. Concerning your contribution, International Osteopathic Association, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.internationalosteopathicassociation.org/insurers.html. As a copyright violation, International Osteopathic Association appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. International Osteopathic Association has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:International Osteopathic Association and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:International Osteopathic Association with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:International Osteopathic Association.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Gurt Posh (talk) 12:58, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at International Osteopathic Association
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from International Osteopathic Association, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 13:28, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of International Osteopathic Association for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International Osteopathic Association is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/International Osteopathic Association until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mike (talk) 04:47, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)