User talk:DrGaryWebb

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sbrools 22:21, 23 December 2006 (UTC)User Sbrools needs to stop bitching and start reading.

And I'll add -- Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Broux 03:03, 9 January 2007 (UTC)User Broux needs to stop warning people and start educating himself.

I have not violated the NPOV policy. Please visit my user page to learn more about me and my background.DrGaryWebb 19:34, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Request
Dear Sir, please help. I've done a LOT of work to try to provide an objective page on Patriarchy. I'm a postgrad student working in a related area. I think I'm caught in a trap. Patriarchy is used objectively in Anthropology and Sociobiology but it has obviously become a jargon word in Feminism. Maybe my mistake is to believe I can present both uses in the one article. Some feminist readers, I think understandably, feel that the objective uses don't do justice to their usage. In their usage patriarchy is immoral by definition. I'm hoping that time will bring more people to discuss things calmly, but I'm anxious. One reader simply deleted all reference to Steven Goldberg and matriarchy references, without discussion and despite everything being referenced. Any advice? Any encouragement? Anything I'm doing wrong? Cheers and thanks. Alastair Haines 08:23, 13 March 2007 (UTC) Postgraduate students are treated very poorly on wikipedia; they allow the most ignorant people you can imagine to edit your article. I have never had any discussions with those who have edited my work; editing is what they call it; although, it then makes your contribution wrong after they change it up and add false information. I would suggest that you only deal with it as best you can, for as long as you can, then go to a source where they do not allow editing by the most ignorant among us. I would suggest you go to a web site where they do not allow such things to happen. =+=+ Sorry.