User talk:DrHorticulture

October 2022
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Josh Gottheimer. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:30, 6 October 2022 (UTC)


 * With respect, your edit notes indicate "ratfucking is perfectly valid", which may well be valid as in not illegal, but I highly doubt that a) the term "ratfucking" would be allowed to be used the page b) the "validity" of the move does not in fact change that the move was made, and that the articles used in source are relevant to a broader tendency which was featured in national media. That there was a "ratfucking" move that was condemned is viewpoint neutral, even if it displays negatively on the "ratfucker". I am more than happy to concede that I do not have great familiarity with wiki-prose.
 * I am more than happy to supply the mailers in question which prominently display "endorsed by trump", and if you any pointers to more constructively and formally provide the information i would be happy to adopt it. DrHorticulture (talk) 01:46, 6 October 2022 (UTC)