User talk:DrMáriás

Deletion
Hi, thanks for message. You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~. I deleted your article because
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. It is now Wikipedia policy that biographical articles about living people must have independent verifiable references, or they will be deleted.
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: His multi-disciplinal art can be featured as having strong and critical attitude that deals with questions deriving from East-European identity, its existential, historic and political contexts. His artistic language implements elements of avantgarde, dadaistic, pop art, soc art and surrealist attitude. He defines his artistic activity and social surgery with the aim of healing the society&mdash; that's opinion and spam, not verifiable fact. Much of the rest of the article is in the same vein.
 * The article was a copyright violation. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. In this case, I can see no evidence that the copied text is licensed as public domain. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. But in any case the copyrighted text is far too promotional to be useful for Wikipedia's purposes, so there would not be any point in your jumping through all the hoops that are required. Note that Hungarian Wikipedia may have different copyright rules to us
 * You have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. Thank you for declaring your interest. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.
 * I need one in English pretty much.&mdash; we are an encyclopaedia, not social media or a free advertising platform, and we can only accept factual, referenced and non-copyright material. We do not publish reviews or opinion pieces

 Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  09:24, 17 May 2014 (UTC)