User talk:DrPoglum

Nongoloza's Children
Thank you for your first article and congratulations!

I have been reviewing the article and making some edits, which are summarized in the revision history. It would be good to get the two sources that you have listed added as inline citations. Can you help me identify which sources provided the information that is in the overview section?

And, the article is currently an orphan. To increase the rate at which the article is read, do you know of other articles that could be linked to this article?

Thanks so much!–CaroleHenson (talk) 21:32, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the corrections. I marked this article as "stub". Of course I will supplement the article. - DrPoglum (talk) 15:52, 6 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Ok, sounds good. If there is anything I can do to help, let me know.–CaroleHenson (talk) 15:59, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Please help me. How can I remove the orphan mark from the article? DrPoglum (talk) 13:34, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
 * By adding links to the article from other articles. Unless Nongoloza's Children is mentioned in other articles, see this. If links cannot be added there, then content could be added (with citations) to link to the article.–CaroleHenson (talk) 15:24, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you! I added links, but the orphan mark continues to hang DrPoglum (talk) 15:46, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Ah.... I took care of it.–CaroleHenson (talk) 15:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you! (^^) DrPoglum (talk) 16:13, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Psychomotorics


The article Psychomotorics has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * None of the cited sources mentions the word "Psychomotorics", nor can I find any evidence of its use in English.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:34, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Psychomotorics


The article Psychomotorics has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * '''Cites references which are not included, such as "Seewald (1987)", suggesting that the text is copied from elsewhere. Some parts are certainly copied: "History" largely from http://munin.uit.no/bitstream/handle/10037/10632/article.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y

No footnotes suggesting how the "Sources" given support the text.'''

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pam D  15:55, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Psychomotorics for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Psychomotorics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Psychomotorics until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pam D  16:14, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
 * This is a scientific term. There are many sources on this topic, and the users have already contributed to the improvements. The article needs to be improved, not deleted. - DrPoglum (talk) 10:20, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Olga Prokopova (creative)


A tag has been placed on Olga Prokopova (creative), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion,. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. VQuakr (talk) 20:34, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of God's gangsters


A tag has been placed on God's gangsters, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Yeryry (talk) 21:18, 28 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Hello. Why my article about the book was seen as advertising? There are no links to buy or sell books? This article is my contribution to Wikipedia. I don`t want that the time I spent to improve Wikipedia passed in vain. I like books that describe criminal traditions different countries I'm sure the book which I posted is worth keeping in Wikipedia, or at least to put the deletion up for discussion. - DrPoglum (talk) 11:16, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Number (book)
Hello, DrPoglum. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, The Number (book), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Zakhx150 (talk) 12:58, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

HEMA Alliance
Hi. I'd like to help improve the HEMA Alliance page. What, in particular, do you find reads like promotional material on it? The Jade Knight (talk) 20:30, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Small Matter of a Horse: The Life of 'Nongoloza' Mathebula


The article The Small Matter of a Horse: The Life of 'Nongoloza' Mathebula has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "While the author of the book is notable, extant sources on this particular book seem only to confirm its existence, rather than provide the level of notability required."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 00:32, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

November 2018
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. ''An edit summary is always useful and is especially important when you tag pages for speedy deletion. It's a good habit to get into on a collaborative project like Wikipedia. Liz Read! Talk! 00:28, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

October 2019
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 00:46, 25 October 2019 (UTC)


 * this is not my account. A few days ago I was in Israel and made edits from Israel. Account 42Marco P. could not be in Israel at this time, and as far as I can see, he also made corrections at this time. You can see the IP history. I did not know that 42Marco P. was making any corrections, otherwise I would not have insisted on checking. But I think that I know who he is.-DrPoglum (talk) 18:43, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
 * This is not what the technical evidence shows (I believe, though I don't personally have access to the technical evidence). The relationship is closer than this. --Yamla (talk) 18:44, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
 * then I don’t understand the reasons for blocking. Now I am participating in the discussion of the neutrality of the article about the Ukrainian organization and cannot give answers. I looked at the member’s edits and did not find a link to my edits. Then what is the reason for the block?-DrPoglum (talk) 18:50, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Please release the lock and allow me to participate in the discussion-DrPoglum (talk) 18:51, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gang Town


The article Gang Town has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable, article is written like an advertisement"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AviationFreak💬 12:23, 1 April 2022 (UTC)