User talk:DrPronoun/Algorithmic radicalization

Peer Review
A lot of information is added to the article, which previously had extremely little. The information in this article is backed up by sources. These sources are reliable. Paragraphs are similar in length and go into detail. The one thing I would say to add is to possibly find an example or case of algorithmic radicalization. Could make this an "Impact" section. SealSquared (talk) 00:24, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Peer Review CF
I like the choice of article because the current article is very empty. I love your choices in sections to add as they add a lot of useful information that is relevant to the subject. One thing I would add is hyperlinks to important terms. For example Facebook can be hyperlinked to the Wikipedia page so that readers can click on it to learn more. In terms of grammar mistakes I found none. I also find that you have the perfect tone for an encyclopedic entry as you don't insert your own opinion. Another thing I would add is in the Social Dilemma section there is no sources so I would add some. Cfeldmar (talk) 01:54, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Peer Review SF
I really like your choice of article! I think that all the new sections you added are really useful and engaging, particularly I liked the "References In Media" section. I would recommend rewriting the "Self-Radicalization" section, as I found the definition to be a little confusing (maybe its just me). Also, I would recommend adding a section about the rebuttals of big-tech and what they have done to address this issue. Besides that, really good article and content! SeenaBerkeley (talk) 01:32, 13 October 2022 (UTC)