User talk:DrRobotnik046

Welcome ! 

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions! I'm Ashbeckjonathan, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge. Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type  here on your talk page, and someone will try to help. Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes   at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your, a link to this talk) page, and a timestamp. The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun! To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. ou can  for use any time. Perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you  put  on.

 Sincerely, User:Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 20:14, 23 May 2014 (UTC)  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ashbeckjonathan&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Welcome_to_Wikipedia/user-talk_preload (Leave me a message)]

Español

Deutsch

Français

Italiano

עברית

Русский

日本語

Polski

فارسی

Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 19:51, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kathy Zielinski


A tag has been placed on Kathy Zielinski requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://disney.wikia.com/wiki/Kathy_Zielinski. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  21:53, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Kathy Zielinski, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  22:01, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kathy Zielinski


A tag has been placed on Kathy Zielinski requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Peridon (talk) 22:06, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of David Block (animator)


The article David Block (animator) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Passengerpigeon (talk) 22:20, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ray Harris (animation artist)


The article Ray Harris (animation artist) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Passengerpigeon (talk) 22:27, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Chill out
You are edit-warring across multiple articles; if you can't find a way to express your opinion on the content 1) on the talk page and 2) without using ridiculous all cap summaries, you will be blocked for disruptive editing.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:06, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
Your recent editing history at Never Cry Wolf (film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. ''Somebody else has already suggested you chill out. Advice I'd second - any more edits like this will get you blocked. Take the discussion to the article talk page and explain why, with sources, why you consider your version is correct.'' Nthep (talk) 19:08, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit-warring and disruptive editing across multiple articles. I warned you that if you continued blind reverting without taking your disagreement to the talk page, you would be blocked. This was your response. When your block expires do not continue to revert to your preferred content. You were bold in making the initial changes, but your edits were reverted, and now you need to start a discussion to get consensus for the changes you want to make. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:13, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Art Stevens (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Fantasia


 * Mark Henn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Tiana

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Since the end of your block for edit warring, you have returned to the same edit war as before, still with no attempt whatever to discuss the changes, and to try to reach consensus. You have therefore been blocked again, this time for a longer time. Wikipedia works by editors collaborating, and discussing things if they disagree, not by each editor repeatedly changing back to the version they think is best, so that the most stubborn and persistent editor eventually gets his or her way. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:23, 2 June 2014 (UTC)