User talk:DrSChaudhry

DrSChaudhry, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

Viresh Pratap Chaudhry
Hi, DrSChaudhry, welcome to Wikipedia. Your name suggests that you may possibly be related to the subject of the article Viresh Pratap Chaudhry. Please note that if you have a conflict of interest with regard to an article, you are discouraged from editing it. Your additions to the article breach the neutrality expected in an encyclopedia, and have been reverted. Please compare our policy Neutral point of view. Bishonen &#124; talk 20:50, 19 April 2015 (UTC).
 * May I ask if you are also the person editing the article from the 59.178.x.x IPs? Bishonen &#124; talk 19:48, 20 April 2015 (UTC).
 * OK, We're asking you to stop posting this because it is the living embodiment of WP:PEACOCK. This isn't even close to neutral. I will be glad to help you improve the article for accuracy and to add information. But Wikipedia is not a place to create puff pieces or personal propaganda. Please do not add the content again without engaging one of us, either as an IP or under your main account, or you will be subject to a block. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:50, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
 * This is now getting somewhat ridiculous. Stop posting this article in this form; Magog has linked you, immediately above, to an essay explaining what our problem is with it. If you keep simply trying to restore that version of the article, you're going to end up blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ironholds (talk) 01:00, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi, this is DrSChaudhry. My problem is incorrect (e.g. Arya Anathalaya and the subject have been linked to Zion Social welfare society- which is absolutely incorrect) and incomplete facts & information about the subject given by Tachs in first place, may be inadvertently, which is being re-endorsed by Ironholds .I am now somewhat understanding what your problem is : the flowery Language in the version. I can try posting the article in a different version with facts and complete information of the subject. DrSChaudhry
 * I would suggest just correcting the bits you believe to be incorrect, and adding references for those bits. "He excelled in his profession and maintained highest standards of professional ethics. His integrity was beyond reproach." is more than 'flowery'. Ironholds (talk) 05:34, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

This version of the article was considered in tribute paid to him after his death in one of the prayer meetings and also in Full Court Reference ( Condolence meeting by Judges) of Delhi High Court. So at least don't call it a spam. The flowery sentence cited above and similar ones could simply be deleted without deleting the facts and information. The subject is not living to push for his propoganda. But it shall be unfair on the subject if incomplete information is given. I have understood that wikipedia would want correct and complete information which is neutral and without any adjectives/flowery language or whatever you may call it, which I shall try to do. DrSChaudhry
 * It was actually copied from somewhere else? We also can't accept text from other organisations, unless it's openly licensed. And yep, we'd prefer neutral information - referenced neutral information. Ironholds (talk) 13:52, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

IP editing
Hello again, DrSChaudhry. You didn't answer my question above if you had also posted from the 59.178.x.x IPs that appear in the article history. Should we assume that was you? Please use your account. IPs are allowed to edit Wikipedia, but editing logged out when you do have an account is not good practice. (I have blocked the 59.178.192.0/19 range.) Bishonen &#124; talk 14:07, 21 April 2015 (UTC).
 * Yes, it is the IP address of DrSChaudhry. I am a novice so it was done inadvertently as I forgot to log in at times.I didnt respond to you earlier as I was trying to figure out by hit and trial where to respond.User:DrSChaudhry
 * That's fine, thanks for responding. Bishonen &#124; talk 17:35, 21 April 2015 (UTC).