User talk:DrSamSmith

Welcome!
Hello, DrSamSmith, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Moonee Ponds Central Shopping Centre, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  15:23, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion of "Moonee Ponds Central Shopping Centre"
Moonee Ponds Central Shopping Centre, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a real person\, group of people\, band\, club\, company\, organization\, or web content\, but does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  15:23, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Jenny Macklin
Please note the changes I made. Apart from removing an unverifiable claim not backed up by the provided reference, i'd like to point out that the reference incorrectly refers to the Division of Jagajaga as a "safe" Labor seat. The Australian Electoral Commission and Antony Green define a safe seat as one with a margin over 10%, fairly safe 6-10%, and marginal less than 6%. The Labor margin in Jagajaga is 3.1%. So whilst Jagajaga might normally be considered safe Labor, the seat goes in to this election as a marginal seat on paper. Timeshift (talk) 15:52, 1 July 2016 (UTC)