User talk:DrTaJ

Silver Moon Books
A tag has been placed on Silver Moon Books, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable. If you can indicate why Silver Moon Books is really notable, you can contest the tagging. To do this, please affix the template  to the page and leave a note on Talk:Silver Moon Books, explaining how Silver Moon Books is notable. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, article #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bubba hotep 12:15, 27 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Hi. I de-speedied the thing, but I proposed it for deleteion. Only about 300 google hits suggests yhe subject may not be notable. Please read WP:CORP for more information about notability for companies.  Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim   12:20, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Silver Moon Books
Silver Moon Books, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Silver Moon Books satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Silver Moon Books and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Silver Moon Books during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Avruch Talk 01:01, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Silver Moon Books
A tag has been placed on Silver Moon Books requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Stillwaterising (talk) 14:49, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Silver Moon Books for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Silver Moon Books is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Silver Moon Books (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Sandstein  20:33, 17 December 2011 (UTC)