User talk:DrU1104

Your submission at Articles for creation: Basile F. E. Curchod (November 24)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Basile F. E. Curchod and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Basile F. E. Curchod, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Basile_F._E._Curchod Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AngusWOOF&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Basile_F._E._Curchod reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F ( bark  •  sniff ) 16:55, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, DrU1104, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you created or edited appears to be an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians—as this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. We require individuals to meet Wikipedia's definition of a notable person to accept articles about them.

The page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page. If your contributions to an existing article about yourself are undone and you wish to add to it, please propose the changes on its talk page.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me?  20:00, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

More
I see you have been removing warning messages, please note that they still count, and this sort of bad faith editing just makes it more likely that you will be blocked Jimfbleak - talk to me?  20:05, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Reply
Thanks for message. You can do what you like on your own page, but that doesn't change the fact that removing messages almost as soon as they are posted doesn't show much transparency. Similarly, this biography is the only topic that you have shown any interest in, so you are likely to be the person concerned, or conceivably someone close enough to him to have to declare a conflict of interest. You also say that you are not going to contribute anything else here, which reinforces that impression.
 * You have looked at the notability criteria for academics, and I am not convinced that you meet the criteria.


 * Your text is mainly either unreferenced or referenced to sources that are not independent of you, including your own papers, your own university page, and you your own organisation. The Northern Echo article is quoting you, and has a highly promo FaceBook based comment at the end. Google Scholar just lists what you have published, it doesn't establish notability because output is not a criterion for notability.
 * I think it's promotional because you are attempting to tell us about your own work.


 * Not reasons for deletion, but you should use sentence case for headings, link more, eg Vevey, adiabatic excited electronic state, and check that your publications are formatted correctly, see Pamela C. Rasmussen as an example. Only link to freely available full text, not abstracts.

I'm prepared to restore the text in principle, but you need to assure me that you can show that you currently meet the notability criteria and you can find better independent third-party sources. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. If you claim not to be him, I think you need to clarify why you seem determined to write about him Jimfbleak - talk to me?  11:40, 25 November 2021 (UTC)