User talk:DrWDMcCoy

Welcome!
Hello, DrWDMcCoy, and welcome to Wikipedia!&#32;Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article.&#32;Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * Best practices for editors with close associations
 * Plain and simple conflict of interest guide
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 01:10, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

I have no conflict of interest. I am not a medical doctor or affiliated with the organization in any capacity. DrWDMcCoy (talk) 01:39, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Reliable secondary sources
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Llll5032 (talk) 02:07, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. Llll5032 (talk) 02:13, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did here and here. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Llll5032 (talk) 02:58, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

I’m in the process of learning. I will valid reasons for edits and expect that you will accept them as valid and not apply your clearly bias view on this topic. DrWDMcCoy (talk) 03:02, 9 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks for responding, DrWDMcCoy. One guideline here is assume good faith. Llll5032 (talk)

I can accept good faith…then in good faith you need to equally accept positive citing, references, comments…in fairness the pros and cons from both viewpoints. DrWDMcCoy (talk) 03:14, 9 September 2021 (UTC)


 * We go by WP:MEDRS ("Biomedical information must be based on reliable, third-party published secondary sources"). Llll5032 (talk) 03:15, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Is a study registered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT 044297411 with pre-print results on MedRxiv considered reliable source? DrWDMcCoy (talk) 03:22, 9 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Yes if we describe the study via a reliable, independent secondary source, per WP:MEDRS, WP:MEDINDY and WP:MEDMOS. But per WP:MEDRS, "Primary sources should generally not be used for medical content – as such sources often include unreliable or preliminary information, for example early lab results which don't hold in later clinical trials." For detailed advice, you can ask editors at WikiProject Medicine. Llll5032 (talk) 04:02, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
 * There's more discussion here on preprints. Llll5032 (talk) 04:06, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
Hello. Your recent edit to Eleanor Roosevelt High School (Maryland) appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Gab4gab (talk) 03:41, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

You removed names from the Eleanor Roosevelt High School (Maryland) notable alumni list with an edit summary of "Removed alumni who are not notable." The names have biography articles in this Wikipedia indicating they are notable. If you disagree I suggest you attempt to have their articles removed as non-notable. If that happens then feel free to remove their names again. For now I've reverted your edit. Gab4gab (talk) 02:32, 15 September 2021 (UTC)