User talk:Dr Asha Joliet

Amway
I rolled back your recent edit, we would need a reliable sources for this kind of edit. --Nuujinn (talk) 23:11, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Amway
Amway very well may be a scam or pyramid scheme, but the site you have linked to would not be considered a reliable source by Wikipedia standards. If you can find, say, a newspaper or well known consumer website that says the same thing then that would be acceptable. ... disco spinster   talk  23:35, 2 February 2011 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=|link=]] You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Amway. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Even if you found a reliable source, as suggested above, you couldn't restore the information now, as you've reverted 3 times. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 00:03, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident.
 * 3) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.