User talk:Dr pragmatists

Welcome!
Hello, Dr pragmatists, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JarrahTree 04:11, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
Hello, I'm XYZtSpace. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Australian Greens, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. XYZt (talk) 04:26, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Correction still in place please find message
Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia Reason for the block Blocked by SQL Block will expire in 1 year / 00:08, 24 June 2020 Dr pragmatists (talk) 03:44, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

2nd Blocked message
Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia Reason for the block Blocked by KrakatoaKatie Block will expire in 47 days / 23:35, 24 August 2018 Dr pragmatists (talk) 03:48, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
 * You are not blocked. Stop pretending that you are. XYZt (talk) 03:58, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Please don't accuse this editor of pretending - it appears to be an IP block. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 06:30, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Ok thanks I’m a newbie to this so up I go the bell curve.

July 2018
Your recent editing history at List of political parties in Australia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bilby (talk) 10:02, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Greens edit war
Hi Bilby, I have had my edits reverted many times, I have referenced documents for my edits and have asked other editors to show reason and documentation on there point of view, which they have not done other than state it has reached a consensus but yet the published information shows a counter argument, I have engaged in talk with all involved but yet nothing. As a result I have had my account suspended (last time I checked) and no reasonable rebuttal of the information it seems more of a censorship than an edit. Any suggestions ? Dr pragmatists (talk) 11:06, 8 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Some clarification. Yes, you "engaged in talk with" me on my Talk page. I replied, and you haven't been back. Please stop lying with the "yet nothing" comment. HiLo48 (talk) 11:14, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Please be patient I’m new to this and I’m trying to work my way around I could not find your reply ?


 * Yes, you ARE new here. Please be willing to learn from more experienced editors. Many have given you advice. Do take notice of it. HiLo48 (talk) 11:35, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Advice on navigation is one thing being censored because evidence goes against your belief is another i included references for these edits they are not just a matter of opinion, my objective is to be pragmatic not to follow a narrative.


 * You are not being censored. And you are not paying attention to what others have said. Here's a non-controversial tip - WP:SIGN. HiLo48 (talk) 11:44, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Ok agreed I need to learn more about the signature aspect but I’m trying to understand the relevance currently but I will prove further. You say others have tried to help me but it’s not seen I have seen an onslaught of defiance from editors not allowing my edits to remain with little explanation, am I missing replies or post from elsewhere ?


 * Read the Edit summaries. Follow the links. Don't be aggressive. And here's another non-controversial tip - WP:INDENT. It helps everyone follow a conversation. HiLo48 (talk) 12:04, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Onwards and upwards the bell curve I go Dr pragmatists (talk) 12:14, 8 July 2018 (UTC)